Christmas In Your Mailbox

May 22, 2020      Roger Craver

 These days my digital inbox is overpowered with vapid and annoying messages fired three times an hour mostly by various candidates and committees affiliated with the Democratic Party.  (If this is the way they treat us donors I wonder about their skill set when it comes to beating Trump?)

Between the spurts of political drivel and the incessant commercial pap that “we’re in this together” fortunately there is the occasional digital appeal from a few nonprofits that do know—and show — what they’re doing, for these I’m happy to respond.

What’s missing in my locked-down life is the mailbox at the end of my lane chock full of letters from my favorite causes.  Sure, there’s one or two a week, but mostly the mailbox is bare except for the interminable flow of insurance and banking flyers.

My mailbox – and I –are lonely and longing for word from charities and causes I care about.

Apparently, I’m not the only one noticing this. Twitter and blogland are aglow with the same question: where’re the nonprofit direct mailings?  Why, at a time like this, are so many nonprofits ignoring or neglecting the most productive channel for individual giving –direct mail?

A Tweet by the committed and curious fundraiser Denisa Casement was all it took to trigger today’s post. In it Denisa notes ‘Every Direct Mail campaign we’ve done since March (right thru to yesterday) has been getting Christmas level results.” [Emphasis added.] 

“So why is my mailbox so empty?  Denisa added in apparent astonishment.  And then provided an answer: “Because fearful management has cancelled existing DM campaigns instead of adding extra campaigns like our clients have.”

I agree with Denisa, and I also believe there ‘s a raft of additional and deeply worrying reasons beyond the innate caution or cowardice of management. I fear that too many organizations have little or no understanding of direct mail and therefore avoid it.  Instead they too easily default to digital, often in the mistaken belief that it’s “free” or inexpensive. Wrong.

Among my many post-pandemic “hopes” is that we not return to “normal.”  If “normal” reappears it will simply signify that we’ve failed to learn.  And if this sector needs some learning –especially smaller organizations – it’s around the importance and value of direct mail.

Coincidentally, the same day Denisa’s Tweet appeared, Mark Philips of Bluefrog Fundraising posted a piece on direct mail titled  Why Direct Mail Lies At The Very Heart of Great Fundraising for the Institute of Fundraising. It’s an excellent primer of the “why” direct mail is important. If you’re already a believer in direct mail it’ll reinforce your beliefs and you should share it with the heathen non-believers in your organization.

In a nutshell, here’s Mark’s take on direct mail’s importance –particularly now:

“There are many ways to fundraise: face to face, telephone, digital, broadcast, press and direct mail.

“But one, stands out.  Particularly at the moment when we sit at home, waiting for the Coronavirus pandemic to subside.

“It’s not as easy as he phone or face to face.  It’s not as cheap as digital.  It’s not repeated day after day like TV ads, but it’s the one approach that I trust to recruit and engage donors over the long-term.  It’s direct mail.”

For those genuinely curious why there’s such difficulty in getting nonprofits to invest in a properly run direct mail program where on average response ratesare on average 37 times higher than the average email marketing response rates you might want to check out these Agitator posts:

  • Are Smaller Organizations Missing Out On The Direct Mail Advantage?  where we conducted a Survey of Agitator readers to determine why so many groups shy away from direct mail.  You’ll find the results reported in Missing Out:  Smaller Organizations and Direct Mail. I urge you to read it along with the quite valuable insights of readers found in the comments section of that post.
  • Smaller organizations are not taking advantage of the power of postal mail.
  • 20% of the respondents felt that most organizations are unaware of the difference in response rates between digital and postal mail. But…assuming the other 80% are more or less aware of the greater financial potential of postal mail, why is it that 33.3% of the respondents feel that “smaller organizations are making too little use of postal/direct mail”?

In priority order here are the reasons why smaller groups are not taking advantage of the power of postal mail.

  1. “Too expensive”
  2. “Management believes we can do it all online.”
  3. “Too much hassle with the logistics of printing and mailing”
  4. “Don’t have time”
  5. “Don’t know enough about how to use direct mail.”

Looking for Even More Reasons?

If you’re looking for other reasons why your mailbox is anorexic there’s a gem of a post from Jeff Brooks  titled: How to deal with the enemy within during the crisisHere’s Jeff’s insight/rant –to which most of us can readily agree:

“The coronavirus pandemic has starkly uncovered one of the deepest and most destructive problems in the fundraising world: The destructive power of the amateur.

“Amateurs — often (but not always) in the form of opinionated board members — often have too much sway in fundraising decision-making. Their habit of making decisions based on nothing but hunch, opinion, and intuition has cost our sector billions in lost revenue over the years.

“They issue rulings like ….

  • “Stop sending direct mail. Nobody reads it any more. Start fundraising on [fad social media site of the moment].”
  • “Our donors are dying! Give up on old people — let’s go after millennial donors!”
  • “Fundraising is too inefficient. Instead let’s just cultivate a great relationship with Oprah/Bill Gates/etc.”

… and a hundred other ill-advised, already-debunked fundraising ‘innovations.’

“The professionals know better. But the amateurs are making the decisions.”

Who’s making those kinds of decisions in your organization?

And, just as importantly, if you haven’t unleashed the power of direct mail, why not? If there’s someone in your outfit who’s saying direct mail won’t work, particularly in this pandemic,  just quote Denisa:  Every Direct Mail campaign we’ve done since March (right thru to yesterday) has been getting Christmas level results.”

Roger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12 responses to “Christmas In Your Mailbox”

  1. Great post. Although our core business is handwritten notes of cultivation, we have sent out some acquisition mailings for small regional organizations that have performed extremely well in the mail (average 5.2% response rate, $74 average gift) and we offer a breakeven guarantee — so there is literally no risk for the organization. Despite that, many of the organizations we have approached are not taking us up on our offer — it’s crazy! This is an excellent way for smaller organizations to build their donor base. Many are just afraid of trying something new.

  2. yes, as someone who is still doing direct mail for my clients too, we’re seeing great results also.

    I am seeing an increased number of donors who are donating online driven there by direct mail, so make sure you evaluate all of your revenue!!

    I’m also seeing some amazing results for those organizations willing to ask for monthly gifts, yeah, proven sustainable revenue for the future!!

    All of the above posts are telling you exactly why some organizations are going to make it and others will simply not because the people in charge don’t get it and don’t want to listen to the experts.

    It’s fascinating, for some reason, when it comes to direct mail and fundraising consultants, I see so many organizations who simply not listen or are simply afraid to implement solid advice.

    They never question anything their lawyer or accountant tells them…

    If anybody has cracked that challenge, I’d love to know. Meanwhile, yeah for those organizations that are not afraid to ask, they’ll be that much farther ahead!

  3. Scott Robertson says:

    As a printer specializing in the non-profit arena, we’ve seen a significant drop off. Some are starting to come back with appeal letters but others are still dormant. Please remember your donors want to hear how those you serve have been impacted by the change in business climate, not how your organization has been impacted.

  4. Lydia Palmer says:

    First directive we got after the WFH order – kill all print projects. We’re not spending money on print. Second directive – kill all planned giving marketing and outreach. We don’t want to appear insensitive. Meeting last week – well, looks like we’re going to come up short of our goal this year…

  5. John Smith says:

    Anorexia is an eating disorder and serious mental health condition, just in case you need reminding, not a term to define “less full”. Poor choice of title here, you need to rethink.

  6. Thank you, Roger and Denisa and Jeff, and everyone else who understands that direct mail is needed now!

    And Erica is right – part of this may be many organizations giving digital the credit for online gifts that were spurred by direct mail.

    I suspect another reason organizations are moving to email only is that they don’t know how to manage dm from their home offices. Can I just say that this is where a good relationship with a printer/mailing house comes in?

  7. David Lacey says:

    Please can you re-think the title? It’s really not OK to use anorexia to try and get more views of a blog post.

    • Roger Craver says:

      Hi John and David

      Thanks for the heads up. No offense intended. Will certainly change the headline.

      Roger

  8. Pamela Grow says:

    Thank you for this, Roger. I beat the direct mail drum incessantly — particularly for small shops — but oftentimes it feels like it’s falling on deaf ears. We’re seeing incredible results as well. One of our students had a spring direct mail appeal, her organization’s first, on the schedule. Her boss has given her free reign, but now she was adamant: NO asking. But my student managed to convince her boss and they sent it out. Now, only days later, they’ve raised over $20,000 (their original goal was $7500).

    And, yes, Mary, it can be a bit more challenging now with printers. I always recommend going local, union if possible, and getting a minimum of three quotes to start. The differences can be astonishing (example: last year I had a project that included a separate post-it note; the note was going to add nearly $700 to the total cost with the mailing house we were using. After reaching out to several printers, I got back quotes for the note only ranging from $68 to over $1000.)

    The investment is something that seems to trip up many organizations. But nothing beats direct mail. It’s tactile. It’s memorable. It sticks. All of us who have worked in development can tell tales of getting checks in envelopes coded from campaigns sent out years earlier (sometimes decades!).

    And a big raise to Denisa Casement: she keeps me on my toes!

  9. Todd Hector says:

    We are here to help all non-profit organizations with deep discounts and quick turnaround. As a niche mail shop with more than 20 years of experience, we can support your programs no matter how big – or small.

  10. Thank you Roger. Great post as usual. We’ve also seen excellent DM results with a wide variety of clients in the past 2 months (excellent digital response too). One complication for DM, far fewer people are learning it. And therefore fundraisers push what they know, which us digital.