Board Meeting Emergency Swipe File #2: Investment

July 20, 2015      Roger Craver

On Friday in the post Our Donors Are Dying I mentioned the ‘Agitator Board Meeting Emergency Swipe File’. Handy responses to those eternal and frequent questions about fundraising posed by boards.

In response Tom Gaffny requested a copy. So, Tom Belford and I’ve decided to reach into our vault and turn my off-the-cuff (imaginary) label into a reality.

Here’s the deal. We’ll add our entries to this Emergency Swipe File and eventually publish it in an e-book IF you and other Agitator readers offer up some questions you frequently get at board meetings.

Here’s Entry #2 aimed at providing you some ammunition on the issue of investment in fundraising.

There’s no question that the shortage of investment funds for fundraising is perceived as a principal barrier to growth. It’s certainly a reason offered in a lot of the comments and email from Agitator readers over the years.

The solution to this problem may lie within your organization itself.

Many charities have significant reserves. Which is no bad thing in and of itself. But, many charities have larger reserves than they need, which is always a bad thing as donors never give our causes money so that we can stockpile it in reserve.

Most charities invest their surplus reserves in stocks and bonds, employing fund managers who, for a fat fee, will manage their portfolio in the hope of generating a better than 1% annual return, which is what certificates of deposit are paying in the U.S. and 1.6% in the U.K.

Boards of Directors love the duty of managing reserves. But, they generally do a lousy job.

Over the last decade or more, returns from such investment have been poor at best, flat or even negative for long periods.

Yet investment in fundraising is another story entirely. It’s almost a dereliction of a board’s fiduciary responsibility not to invest some of those reserves judiciously in donor recruitment and development. An investment that would yield an annual rate of return for most organizations of 20%, 30% or even more.

This Investment Paradox — investing in stocks and bonds while ignoring the far higher yield of investing in your own fundraising and growth — is probably little known or noticed by most Boards and CEOs.

It’s time they wake up!

And sounding the alarm is exactly what British fundraising strategist Giles Pegram set out to do three years ago through an analysis of the investment returns of 32 U.K. charities.

He assumed a scenario where, instead of investing in the usual stocks and bonds, the charities would take £1 million from reserves and invest in their own fundraising programs.

As you can see from the chart below the average return on the fundraising investment for these charities was vastly more impressive than the return on conventional investments.

 

Investment Paradox

I’ll take a 3 to 1 return on investment over a 0.5 to 1 return on investment any day. I bet your board and CEO would too. (Once they get over their embarrassment.)

And I know for certain your donors will be a lot happier knowing you’re using some of their money by investing wisely — and with quite high returns — in building the future of your organization.

Oh yes, we can already hear the naysayers in the C suites and boardrooms. “But, it’s risky and unconventional.”

Nonsense. Because you’ve already tested and know near-certain results of stable, proven fundraising programs — acquisition, monthly giving, whatever — you know precisely when the funds can be paid back and how much you’ll make on the investment. Can’t say that about many banks these days.

So why not do a comparison for the CEO and Board. Show them what the current return is on the invested reserve or endowment funds. Then show them what the return is on your fundraising.

If you don’t get a raise, you should definitely update your resume because you’re dealing with folks who either don’t understand the value of money or don’t care.

Is your organization putting its reserve funds to work in growing its future?

Roger

P.S.  In case you’re not sure how to go about calculating the comparisons between what the board investment committee is getting and what your fundraising program returns, we’ve prepared a brief Agitator Guide to Calculating Investment Comparisons.

 

 

5 responses to “Board Meeting Emergency Swipe File #2: Investment”

  1. Roger,
    Great article this piece needs to be on NPO Board’s summer reading list.Powerful!

  2. Jay Love says:

    Wow, this is going to shock many slightly stuffy boards if anyone has the guts to truly bring the subject up.

    If I had a nickel for every time in the last 32 years that a charity stated they could not INVEST in technology that would leap frog them forward due to a conservative budget the total would be a decent lead gift for an upcoming campaign…

  3. Tom Ahern says:

    Point well made: invest in fundraising. A 20% return is yummy. And if you have surplus reserves, for sure don’t settle for 1% or 1.5%. The Rhode Island Foundation, my local community foundation, boasts a solid 10-year return on investment of 7.3%. And then there are the investment superstars of the nonprofit world. Yale in 2014 achieved a 20.2% return on its endowment. In fact, US university endowments of $1 billion or more averaged 16.5% in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014.

  4. My dream… that foundations who want to support fund development put some serious money into those departments. Not one development director, but a whole department.

    I often share this case study from the Nonprofit Finance Fund of the growth of the The Steppenwolf Theatre . It’s long, but worth reading:

    “The development department, which had mostly concentrated on special events like gala evenings with ensemble celebrities, would now be a multifaceted, fully professionalized program with individual strategies for corporate donors and sponsors, foundations, government agencies,
    civic groups and leaders, small contributors, and wealthy patrons. The department’s staff would grow from three people in 1995 to
    13 by the end of the decade”
    http://nonprofitfinancefund.org/files/docs/SteppenwolfWebVersion.pdf

  5. Thanks so much for making such an important point, as always, Roger! I’m very much looking forward to your e-book.
    And Gayle, thanks for sharing the case study.