• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

AI

Giving Tuesday 2023: Tips and Hacks

            Over the years we’ve offered many tips (as in Try Dying for Giving Tuesday) and many admonitions (see Avoid the Snoringly Generic Approach to Giving Tuesday)             Most recently, Kevin’s 2023 entry weighed in with Livng Dusday our study of 573 Giving Tuesday emails scored on meeting (or not) […]

Learn More November 3, 2023

“Because It Works, That’s Why.”

Perhaps it’s time to rethink the ‘because it works’ claim so often trotted out in defense of dubious, deceptive fundraising tactics; enter the political email season. Between April 1st and 19th of 2019 the presidential candidates (at the time) sent a combined 1,730 messages, more than 19 a day, to supporters.  In defense or explanation […]

Learn More April 10, 2023

How Much Is Your Organization Like Twitter?

Fire sale.  That’s how Twitter is touting their latest ad offer.  It’s a familiar fire sale to Agitator readers and every fundraiser who’s been in the field for more than five minutes.  And it’s uber familiar to every donor on the planet. A match.  Spend $250k, get $250k of free ads.   I often hear consultants […]

Learn More February 8, 2023

Avoid the Snoringly Generic Approach to GivingTuesday

Kevin’s post, The Median Charity Theory , makes clear the behavioral science principle of minimal differentiation applies to most  nonprofits. Consequently, most swim happily in the Sea of Sameness bobbing about on the good ships “Same Old, Same Old” and “Ask More, Make More” taking little risk and making little effort to stand out from the crowd. […]

Learn More November 14, 2022

What if Donors Could Give More Now and Pay Later?

A huge bonus springing from the BBB’s Wise Giving Alliance’s Heart of Giving Podcast are the windows host Art Taylor opens onto the personalities and motivation of folks who do the work, provide the charitable services, and come up with innovations worth exploring in our sector. Such was last week’s podcast featuring Dominic Kalms, the […]

Learn More July 13, 2022

First Aid for Giving Tuesday

We don’t need analysts or fortune tellers  to predict the two greatest self-inflicted injuries on Giving Tuesday. The first will involve stupidly or fraudulently executed matching gift offers. The second,  equally stupid and inexcusable failure to meaningfully thank donors for their participation. Here are simple steps you still have time to take to avoid unnecessary […]

Learn More November 19, 2021

Fundraisers Giving Back

One of the truly impressive qualities of folks in fundraising is their generosity when it comes to giving back to advance our trade. You can see this generosity in the Comments sections of The Agitator –the willingness to share criticism, thoughts, and ideas. ….And in the countless hours of webinars and conferences presented by dozens […]

Learn More August 18, 2021

Giving Tuesday and Why We’re Killing It

Editor’s Note:  For those Agitator readers preparing for Giving Tuesday, there’s really no new advice necessary.  However, there’s plenty of seasoned advice that should be heeded. Thus we repeat this post written three years ago by Nick Ellinger. Giving Tuesday and The “When”  vs. “Why” of Giving I like the idea of Giving Tuesday very […]

Learn More November 18, 2020

After 2000 Years, Your Chance to Make Matching Gift History

Today we’re serving a helping of Roman history paired with the an elixir to lift your pandemic depressed spirits by helping an association of fundraisers in New Zealand that’s in dire straits. Over the years we’ve offered up dozens of posts on Matching Gifts – the do’s, don’ts and effective alternatives.  But, horror of horrors, […]

Learn More August 12, 2020

Stop Toilet Paper Hoarding. Start Empowering Your Donors.

Everyone has an opinion and advice on what to do about the Coronavirus Pandemic.  Even ISIS has weighed in, warning its followers to stay away from Europe so they don’t get infected. Here at The Agitator we’re focused on the effects the pandemic will have on fundraising in hopes we can offer some helpful insights, […]

Learn More March 16, 2020

1 2 3 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!