10 Most Innovative Nonprofits
In its March issue, Fast Company names the 50 “World’s Most Innovative Companies”.
The list was topped by Amazon, Google and Uber … not many surprises in their Top 10, although I humbly confess — Luddite that I am — that I did not recognise #8 Twilio, and once past the Top 10, my recognition rate fell well below 50%! Test yourself.
But getting closer to home, Fast Company also presented its list of Top Ten winners in the Not-For-Profit sector, and they are:
- Pledge 1%
- GiveDirectly
- The Movement for Black Lives
- DataKind
- New Story
- Hive
- Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
- Good Ventures
- Charity Network
- Fund for Public Housing
A mix of ‘enablers’ (ways/tools to give) and ‘doers’.
What do you think of that list, boys and girls?
They also nominated a ‘Social Good’ category:
- Chobani
- GoFundMe
- Zipline
- Nike
- Unilever
- Patagonia
- Qlik
- Fitwel
- Yazda
- Alphabet
With both sets of selections, Fast Company includes a link to a story it has written about each organization’s innovative noteworthiness. I found these quite informative, even when they didn’t quite convince me to endorse the selection.
Tom
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer