4 Reasons To Care About Under-40s, Now
We can't tell you how many times we've heard non-profit execs and marketers blow off the under-40 population.
Why? Because these “youngsters” are perceived not to donate. Because they're harder to reach and maintain contact with via conventional direct marketing (read: mail), especially in the younger age brackets. Because they are perceived by cause advocates to be less politically engaged and influential.
Is this wise? We think not. In fact, if you're not cultivating under-40s, you oughta be fired.
Here is a DonorTrends White Paper we've prepared discussing four reasons your organization should care now about the “Post-Boomers” born after 1964.
In a nutshell, GenX and Yers:
- Donate now.
- Have proven value now as activists and volunteers.
- You need them to refresh and renew your brand.
- And, if those three reasons aren't enough, if you want them later, you'd better get your brand on their radar now.
More on why and how to approach the under-40 crowd in our DonorTrends White Paper.
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer