About Water Moccasins and Thinking Ahead
If you follow American politics and the tactics of the presidential campaigns on and off the web, you’re aware of ways they savage each other. But, have you really thought about how these same tactics can be easily and effectively used against your organization?
Are you really aware of how much the damaging effects of humor, sarcasm and parody come into play when these same tactics are used by those opposed to your cause?
I sure hope so, because like the deadly water moccasin, the strike is sudden, and at first silent. Then the poison erupts in viral circulation through blogs and emails and turns deadly. Unless you’re on top of the new media and what’s happening in cyberspace affecting thousands or millions you won’t see it coming. Nor will you be prepared.
For our readers in the ideological and issue advocacy sphere of the fundraising and communications spectrum our adivice is simple: get ready. What you see online in American politics will quickly migrate to issue and policy concerns as well. As we all learned in tenth grade biology ‘ontology recapitulates phylology’ (or in the words of Ms. Gibson, my biology teacher at Gettysburg High, "evolution makes sure strong stuff sticks").
Thus, the latest "love fest" debate between the Democratic candidates for the presidency, is immediately transmuted and translated by the alternative press and blogs of the internet. And the volume and quality of debate is modified and easily distorted.
Start paying attention right now by viewing this independent and well-produced video spoof on Friday night’s debate between Clinton and Obama.
Of course it’s ‘comedy’ and ‘parody’ but you won’t be laughing when your opponents use this tactic on you.
Please pay attention. You simply must anticipate and be ready to deal with the "Wild West" tactics of the internet. Look again at the ‘mashup" spoof of last week’s debate created by Cup O’Politics ( in fact, look at a lot of their other stuff as well) and think how similar tactics, less benign, far more malignant in the hands of your opponents could be used against your cause.
Forewarned is forearmed.
Roger
P.S. If you work for an organization with an ideological orientation and aren’t monitoring what your opponents are doing online, in the mail and in the press, and if you don’t have an Immediate Response Plan for all of these channels, well you oughta be fired.
This prob better place to have submitted question re Obama?
c/p’d
Re fundraising in the political sector
Why has there not been any publicized review/research into the Obama campaign’s fundraising? Other than, of course, the press reports of huge amounts of funds raised hyped or attributed in a large part to “grassroots contributions”. Especially given that small political contributions (less than 100 or 101 dollars?) do not require a donor’s name and are not “reported” in a traceable way. If you know of any informative URLs or phone numbers, can you direct me to same?
Ergo, is there a correlation between Obama “grassroots” contributions given sooooooooo much hype in the press and the number of contributions “under the (reportable) radar screen”? From your experience, would it be difficult to do such small contributions on line or thru the mail……from anywhere in the world? . Although political candidates are not “required” to report contributions under the 100 or 101 dollar amount, it begs the questions that no one seems to ask. Are there similarities in mail or email eddresses, donor names or more succinctly, similarity of traceable IP addresses? Is there a way to determine if the smaller amounts are being methodically contributed from a larger source or entity of a political or religious persuasion?? Perhaps these small group contributions are handled by a select group within the campaign.
I understand that to even view the Obama site, you have to log in with an email address……. so one would be in their database even if simply wanting to read more about him. Why? Simply to send a thank you………which could be done if/when viewer makes a contribution. If not that, what? Just a bit too much like big brother ………whoops, that dates me, nest pas? Just a bit too much like the one world / single government ideals currently underway and becoming less subtle as time goes on..
Looking forward to your response!
Take Care
Carlie
Also, was there a major rock band or celebrity booked in St Louis as there was in Europe when such a huge crowd attended his campaign stomp? Neither published nor reported to my knowledge.