Be Innovative And Traditional?
The post title reminds me of the spoof video making fun of management consultancies with the edict by the client to make 3 lines that are simultaneously parallel and perpendicular and the obsequious senior consultants promising it.
Being Innovative and Traditional in format, design and copy seems impossible. At least if we’re limiting ourselves to one communication. There is another option to make it possible and it doesn’t involve a random nth 50/50 split between the two.
Any guesses?
What if you knew you had two audiences on your file and Audience One will be most responsive to this brief:
- use words like achievement, determination, commitment
- adopt a formal tone with CEO or leader as signer
- Include efficiency ratings
- convey information in logical sequence
- use high quality paper stock and consistent, simple, color and design
Audience Two to this brief:
- use words like imagine, discover, inspire, create
- use complex speech like metaphors or analogies
- ask provocative rhetorical questions
- make it visually engaging with charts
- use highly aesthetic photos showing people experiencing new things
- use creative formats and color variety
If you send the communication for Audience One to Audience Two or vice versa, it will bomb. And yet this happens every single time you send out an email, direct mail or run an ad.
Why? Because Audience One and Two live on your file and both are sizeable.
Audience One is people high in trait Conscientiousness. Audience Two is high in Openness. They are very different people even if they look the exact same per RFM and demographics. Here is the ‘paint by numbers’ one-pager for Conscientious people. Page two has sample digital ads and longer copy for email and letter templates.
Want to learn how to find these people on your file and see examples? Join us at our learning session, registration is free.
Kevin
P.S. DonorVoice is hiring, if you’re high in Conscientiousness, Agreeableness and Openness and yearning for professional growth, take a peak here.
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer