Be Wary Of Absolutist Advice
Yesterday on his Future Fundraising Now blog (before which The Agitator often genuflects), Jeff Brooks proffered The case against innovation.
It seems he tried to innovate once and failed. But now he’s made a second mistake, he’s broadly generalized from that experience and concludes: “If you want your fundraising to work, stick to the conventions.”
Wow … is that bad advice!
Most fundraising is not working these days precisely because folks are blindly sticking to conventions.
The Agitator has nothing against conventions. We’ve often ranted that fundraisers, especially newbies, insist on either re-inventing the wheel or ignoring practices that have heaps of current empirical evidence to support them.
But we would never elevate our reverence for the ‘true and tested’ to a cardinal rule like “stick to the conventions.”
Firstly, because even old ‘best practices’ need to be re-tested and re-examined. If only from a “Is this the best tactic given my nonprofit’s circumstances?” standpoint.
But secondly, as Roger has been cautioning, because a hell of a lot of nonprofits are going down the tubes if they don’t innovate … at least trialing more up-to-date tools and concepts. That’s what his Flat Earth Fundraising series of posts is all about. Just search ‘Flat Earth Fundraising’ on our site … here’s the first in the series.
C’mon Jeff, you don’t really think there’s a case against innovation, do you?
Tom
2 responses to “Be Wary Of Absolutist Advice”
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer
I think Jeff’s point actually is, you don’t dump the tried and true for the hip and trendy. Innovation for the sake of being “cutting edge” and hip is very different from innovating to improve results.
There is a lot of hip & trendy marketing being driven by agencies and people new to the field who have no idea about the short term or long term goals of fundraising. They think being hip will save the day and it just doesn’t.
Fundraising innovation needs to be focused on the right goals and judged by the bottom line. I don’t want to hear “it raised awareness” or “it was really cool”. I want to hear how it impacted the bottom line…I’m a fundraiser…I’m funny like that.
This reminds me of what I tell the high school students I volunteer with; if you don’t have a better idea, do what is conventional (and apply to college). As Jeff says, “When you flout the conventions, no matter how cool it is, you make everything harder.” That certainly has a ring of truth to it, and so I believe erring on the side of caution to be sage advice. If as a fundraiser, you have a really great idea that is relevant and smart, it makes sense to go for it. Otherwise, just stick to the tried and true.