• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives
Discover the behavioral science principles that relate to fundraising.
  • Agency
  • Anchoring
  • Context effect
  • Commitment & consistency
  • Default Bias
  • Desire for Completion
  • Exceptional Expense
  • Goal Proximity
  • Hassle Free
  • Hyperbolic Discounting (present bias)
  • Identifiable Victim Effect
  • Identity
  • Loss aversion
  • Mental Accounting
  • Overhead Aversion
  • Perceived Impact
  • Perceived Control
  • Social Proof
  • Time-Ask Effect
  • Urgency
  • Voice of authority
Discover How to Tackle 8 Fundraising Challenges.
  • Acquisition
  • Average gift
  • Consent to marketing
  • Lapsed reactivation
  • Regular gift conversion
  • Donor Retention
  • Upgrade
  • 2nd gift conversion

30th September & 1st October 2019

Access the talks

 

So, what is behavioral science?

Most of our decisions including the decision to donate time or money aren’t always the result of careful deliberation. There are numerous factors, conscious and subconscious, that affect them like what other people are doing or the context we’re in. Behavioral science tries to explain why people do what they do and how we could increase desired behaviors or eliminate problematic ones.

Don’t try it at home

Behavioral science is a hot topic in fundraising right now. Yet its popularization could also be its downfall. It is often seen as panacea, a magic bullet, that is very easy to use on your own. And when it doesn’t work it’s easily dismissed as a cheap trick.

In reality, behavioral science is a complex science whose application requires subject matter expertise. Reading a few popular books on the topic might help you understand the theory, but it doesn’t provide the necessary training on how to practice it.

Just as you wouldn’t want a friend to perform an operation after reading a couple of textbooks, you shouldn’t apply behavioural science without the help of an expert. That’s why DonorVoice wants to help.

Popular books recite numerous biases and principles, each tested in a specific field. Just because a nudge worked in one field, there’s no guarantee it’ll work in another, in this case fundraising. Blind application of nudges from different areas can have catastrophic results.

Testing is imperative when it comes to behavioral science. And to do it you need a deep understanding of how the effectiveness of even well-known biases might change in different contexts, audiences, or channels as well as expertise on experimental design and analyses.

Meet the DonorVoice Nudge Unit and Kiki, DonorVoice’s resident Behavioral Scientist

Kiki combines subject matter expertise with years of fundraising practice.

With a PhD in cognitive psychology, she’s been helping charities apply behavioral science and improve their fundraising for the last 6 years. Her deep knowledge of the numerous behavioral biases and principles can only be matched by her understanding of whether and how these insights might be relevant to fundraising. Through testing, she’s put many effects to the test to see if they can also be effectively applied to increase giving behavior.

Kiki also created the first-ever nudge unit for our sector, the DonorVoice Nudge Unit; the most qualified team to help you apply behavioral insights to your fundraising challenges. The academics you see on the right are all subject matter experts, who are devoting themselves to partnering with you to get beyond ‘best’ practice to better results.

Our goal is to help you create a culture of curiosity in your organisation that is consistently looking to improve and apply these insights to all aspects of your fundraising. That’s why, in addition to our services, we also offer for free to our subscribers:

Behavioral principles that relate to fundraising
From the drop down menu above, our subscribers can explore some of the key biases that could increase giving. Each principle includes a brief definition, an application example and a fundraising opportunity.

How to tackle 8 fundraising challenges with behavioral science.
From the second drop down menu, our subscribers can access suggested solutions to a fundraising challenge they might be facing.

How can we help?

Behavioral science might not be a silver bullet, but applied consistently and rigorously it can lead to big improvements in your fundraising results. Have a look at our services and ask for a free call back to discover how behavioral science could and should be applied to help you achieve your fundraising goals.

Meet the Scientists

  • Dr. Kiki Koutmeridou
  • Dr Stephan Dickert
  • Peter Ayton
  • Elizabeth Keenan
  • Hengchen Dai
  • Enrico Rubaltelli
  • David Reinstein
  • Ayelet Gneezy

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!