Boomers Not Keen On Social Media?
For some time I’ve subscribed to Jumpin Jack Flash, the e-newsletter of the Boomer Project, watching for insights on marketing to what we assume to be the next treasure trove of donors.
Here is their take on Boomers and social media:
"Let’s agree social networking is simply not as widely accepted among Boomers and older adults as it is among today’s young adults. And … maybe it never will be."
The Boomer Project gives two reasons why they don’t expect Boomers to widely embrace social media:
1) Social media sites expressly targeting Boomers have failed to date, indicating Boomers just aren’t interested.
2) The psychology of social media is wrong for Boomers — older adults get increasingly more selective about relationships and seek emotional satisfaction from established relationships. Generally, they aren’t looking to expand their social system.
Using Facebook as the benchmark, the article notes that, even with recent growth of social media in the older age segment, penetration remains quite low — 60% of the 18-34 age group are Facebook users (43 million users); only 13% of those aged 45+ are (15.7 million users).
Our own DonorTrends data, however, suggest that among established donors, Boomers are significantly more engaged with social media — 26% publish their own profiles on social net sites, 41% visit the profiles of others, and 17% have donated to someone’s personal fundraising page.
That paints a more promising picture for fundraising than the Boomer Project would suggest … even to a "bear" on social media like myself.
Tom
P.S. If you haven’t already, you really should get your hands on the DonorTrends white paper Roger and I prepared focusing on social media — Online Giving 3.0 … New Approaches for Early Adopters. It’s bundled for $50 with Online Fundraising: Postage Still Dominates, But Mouse Is Gaining.
4 responses to “Boomers Not Keen On Social Media?”
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer
I read Online Giving 3.0 … New Approaches for Early Adopters and was very enlightened. However, I read the methodology section and the media used to conduct the surveys and had questions. While I do not question the validity of the completed surveys, would the selection of media for the surveys potentially skew the results?
An interesting take, but I’m not convinced this is true. Look at LinkedIn and the growth of their numbers on Facebook. As Facebook became more relevant, i.e. not entirely focused on the college crowd, and offered relevant ways for them to connec t, they have started jumping on board in droves.
This trend will not reverse as long as social media is relevant to them. Organizations wanting to target these audiences should find the relevant material they are looking for and analyze the best ways to connect. We’ve found that educated and involved boomers have been increasingly interested in social media, but only when it has been relevant for them.
-Erica
Take a look at Facebook Insider for some very enlightening data. Like the fact that women 55+ were the fastest growing Facebook segment in Q1 of this year at 1,650,000 new users…but in Q2 650,000 of those same users unsubscribed. This is fairly strong evidence of Boomer Project’s point. Boomers will try it, but if it doesn’t make sense for their lifestyle, they won’t stay.
I have to agree with Brent, Boomers will try social networking, and if it doesn’t work for them they may move on, or try it again later. Social networking has become so mainstream among young people that eventually it will catch on with Boomers, it will just take longer.