Bringing Back the Best of the Good Old Days
Forty years ago, when our kids were small, we’d pile into the car and head to the local Chili’s in Northern Virginia. Back then, it felt like the friendliest place on earth. The fajitas sizzled, the chips came out warm, and the servers remembered your name—or at least acted like they did. The place smelled like grilled meat and warm tortillas. Somebody was always laughing in the next booth over. If you were lucky, you got a table near the window where the light came in just right. It wasn’t fancy, but it felt good. You walked out a little fuller and a little lighter at the same time.
Those were also the days when direct mail prospecting letters could pull a 2% or 3% response without breaking a sweat. First year retention rates twice what they are today. We hand-typed thank-you notes or wrote them out in pen. Addressed the envelopes by hand. At the end of the day we’d tally the returns, adding them to a spreadsheet manually to ensure we had a first-hand feel for what was happening. No blind reliance on any automatic this or that. We weren’t Luddites—we had all the tech available at the time. But we insisted on staying close to what our donors were doing, gaining not only helpful insights but also the satisfaction of seeing a good day’s work right there in front of us.
The simplicity that made Chili’s special back then also defined successful direct response fundraising.
When Things Got Complicated
Chili’s lost some of that magic over the years. They got bigger, more complicated. The menu ballooned. The kitchens clogged with too many gadgets and too much prep. Service slowed. The warmth faded. People drifted away.
Sound familiar? Many nonprofits followed the same path—adding programs, multiplying messages, stacking technology on top of technology until the simple act of connecting with a donor became buried under layers of complexity.
The Chili’s Comeback
And then—this year—they came back. Last week Chili’s posted a 24% year-over-year boost in sales and a stock price up 17% for the year. All this at a time when most of their competitors saw declining or flat sales.
What did they do? George Felix, the marketing chief, and Kevin Hochman, the CEO, did what a lot of leaders are afraid to do: they cut. They cut the menu almost in half. They took out the “It’s Just Wings” station that cluttered the kitchen. They replaced the slow, sweaty conveyor-belt ovens with TurboChefs that cooked faster and didn’t bake the cooks alive in the process.
They put the Ziosk tablets back on the tables so customers could order and pay when they wanted, without waiting for a server to run the card. They focused on what they did best—burgers, fajitas, margaritas—and made sure those things were as good as they could possibly be.
Here’s the important part: these changes weren’t just for the customer. They also made life easier for the staff. Cooks could move without tripping over prep stations. Servers could turn tables faster and focus on the guests instead of the register. Everyone’s job got a little lighter, a little more rewarding.
The result? Same-store sales up. Traffic up. Social media buzzing. And people walking out of Chili’s again saying, That felt good. I’ll come back.
The Fundraising Parallel
The Problem |
The Solution |
|---|---|
Menu bloated, kitchens crammed with extra stations, cooks juggling too much. |
Menu cut nearly in half. Removed unnecessary stations. Streamlined prep so cooks can focus on what they do best. |
Many campaigns running at once, disparate messages competing for attention. |
Strip it down to the strongest story. Focus on the donor’s identity and core values. |
Hot, slow conveyor ovens and cluttered lines made kitchen work harder. |
Installed TurboChef ovens—faster, cooler, cleaner—making life easier for staff and improving food. |
Complex systems slow us down and create barriers between staff and donors. |
Use tech that makes life easier, not harder. Automate address correction and reporting, but keep the human connection in your content. |
Ziosk tablets disappeared, slowing ordering and payment. |
Tablets back on tables—customers pay when they want, leave feedback instantly. |
Giving options can be clunky, forcing donors to jump through hoops. |
Let donors give how and when they want—easy online forms, multiple payment options, mobile-friendly design—all followed by prompt, heartfelt thank you notes . |
Management lost touch with front-line staff and customer experience. |
CEO walked the floor, listened to staff, celebrated “Chiliheads.” |
Blind reliance on automation risks losing personal connection with donors and insights from front-line staff. |
Call donors just to thank them. Ask your staff what’s working—and what’s not. Watch donor responses daily and share discoveries. |
Food came out slow, service felt transactional. |
Guests leave thinking, “That felt good—I’ll come back.” |
Too often, donor interactions feel mechanical and impersonal. |
Make every contact feel like a warm plate of fajitas—personal, timely, and worth coming back for. |
Getting Back to What Works
Like Chili’s, we can get back to that place where people walk away thinking, That felt good. I want to come back.
The trick might be the same now as it was when we posted results manually and hand-addressed thank-you envelopes: keep it simple, make it human, and do it well enough that people remember how you made them feel—even decades later.
Technology should help us do that, if we use it like Chili’s used their TurboChefs and Ziosks—not to make things fancier, but to make them smoother. To give staff more time to connect. To give donors more ways to say “yes” without jumping through hoops.
It’s about bringing back the best of the good old days, not because we’re nostalgic, but because the fundamentals still work: warm welcome, generous plate of good stories and emotion, clear choices, an easy path to donate, and real gratitude.
That’s the recipe. And it’s one worth serving again and again.
Roger
P.S. While we’re on the subject of Old and New and what the future holds check out this Going Big Podcast on YouTube where Richard Viguerie and I discuss the past 60 years of our friendship…how we got into fundraising…what’s necessary to maintain an edge in changing tines…and what lies ahead.



This is wonderful, thank you.
I love your point about going back to the good from the old days… Personal connections. Thank you notes. Warm conversations. Human interest.
It’s like being on the Metro/Subway/T/Marta/BART or other name, wherever you are: everybody is on their phone. Nobody talks anymore… Let’s bring that back because there’s so much to learn from each other. As long as you’re open to it.
Well done reminder of the solid fundraising tips. Your podcast with Richard is an excellent opportunity.
Gerrymandering
Yes, yes, yes! We didn’t know how lucky we were when being human was pretty much the only way we could do things. I remember keeping donor records in the equivalent of shoeboxes. I hand wrote every gift entry. I felt like I really KNEW these people. Still, continuing to do things the way we did them 10, 5 or even one year ago makes no sense. New tools can, as you note, help both the staff and the donors. I love the idea of “make things easier” being our mantra. But we must beware of the “whack a mole” syndrome. Using AI to automate things might make it easier for staff, but not really easier for donors. And some things we do for donors are hard on staff. Finding the right balance is key. Thank you, as always, for your invaluable (and common sense) perspective Roger.