• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Selling The Experience

Angel Aloma gave us a hugely important reminder in his recent article — Selling the Experience — in NonProfitPRO. When I first saw the title, I expected another article — like many we’ve written in The Agitator — on the importance of the quality of interaction nonprofits have with their donors and our need to […]

Learn More June 16, 2017

Good Enough Is No Longer Good Enough – Part 2: Commitment

In Part 1 we noted that the days of launching an acquisition campaign without setting aside substantial additional time and funds to properly deal with new donors is a principal reason why organizations find themselves on the decline or plateauing when it comes to growing donor value and net income. Also noted is the importance […]

Learn More June 1, 2017

Why Good Enough Is No Longer Good Enough: Part 1

I ended my last post No One Wants More Email with the admonition, “We all need to get used to demanding more information and start challenging the status quo. Why? Because nothing, absolutely nothing is more dangerous to our future than acceptance of the status quo.” No area of the fundraiser’s work is more deserving of […]

Learn More May 31, 2017

Spotlight On Sustainers: Part 2

Today we focus on research-based best practices — not anecdotes and tribal wisdom — of what produces significant results in launching and growing sustainer programs. Yesterday, in Part 1 of the Blackbaud Institute’s Sustainers in Focus, the spotlight was on the financial pros, cons and myths surrounding monthly giving programs. Having shown the undeniable value of […]

Learn More May 18, 2017

Spotlight On Sustainers – Part One

Way back in 2011 I reported on The Future of Fundraising, a monumental session of brainiacs hosted by Blackbaud and summarized by Adrian Sargeant that sets forth needed changes if our sector is to grow and thrive. It’s well worth reading the summary to see how far we’ve come — or not — in the past six […]

Learn More May 17, 2017

Converting Advocates Into Donors

So far this week The Agitator has focused on peer-to-peer or DIY fundraising. Many nonprofits see these efforts as a ‘new’ way to feed the acquisition pipeline. That’s fine, so long as the necessary cultivation occurs to bind the new folks — who mostly responded to personal appeals to help friends and relatives — to […]

Learn More May 11, 2017

DIY Fundraising

Not that long ago, I recall sitting in debates over how nonprofits with ‘strong’ brands to ‘protect’ should behave in the face of online tools that ‘threatened’ the ability of HQ to control the use of their brands. A typical example would be the ‘horror’ of an activist or donor using the nonprofit’s logo in a […]

Learn More May 8, 2017

Making The Most Of Your Agitator Subscription

Many Agitator have been with us for our entire 10 year history. Many others are recent subscribers, and there are lots of folks in between. AND … some readers haven’t yet subscribed. You can remedy that egregious oversight right here. Regardless of the length of time you’ve been reading The Agitator we want to make sure […]

Learn More May 4, 2017

All That Work … For 49,421 Donors!

Good day, it’s Tom the grouch again. Just browsing through the Fundraising Effectiveness Project’s 2017 report, a marvellous  gift from Bloomerang, DonorPerfect, eTapestry and Neon. The report examines year-to-year fundraising results (2015-16) from the 10,829 clients using the software of these firms. Recently our sector has been losing more donors than gained each year. In […]

Learn More May 2, 2017

Dust Off Your Typewriter!

As soon as I wrote that subject line, I shuddered with the thought: I wonder how many Agitator fundraisers have actually ever owned a typwwriter?! A real typewriter (I’ll accept electrics). I’m guessing 20% max. What do you think? Indeed, will you confess to having owned one? I’m on to typewriters having glanced at some of […]

Learn More April 28, 2017

<< 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 … 30 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!