• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Blog Post

Do we retain donors or burn donors?

Hello, world. I’m Nick Ellinger, the newest addition to the DonorVoice team. I’m excited to join an organization dedicated to improving donor experiences, increasing donor retention, and doing both with science-proven strategies. One of my pet questions is why retention is not taken more serious in the nonprofit world. Yes, we track it (sometimes), but […]

Learn More August 11, 2016

Demographics are Garbage

This is absolutely the type of headline we would write in order to be contrarian and provocative (not to mention, accurate).  Alas, we can’t take credit.  This is the headline from a recent article about Netflix whose headline reads, in full, “Netflix says geography, age and gender are garbage for predicting taste.”  Blame Netflix for […]

Learn More July 20, 2016

Is Donor-Centric Real or Unicorn?

In our prior post we stipulated that donors want to donate. They don’t want massive frustration and irritation in doing so, which is precisely what all the asks (i.e. volume) causes.  There is a study here proving that point.  And it doesn’t irritate some tiny, minority of folks who really aren’t “good” donors anyway, it irritates the […]

Learn More

Want a good donor experience and better retention? Start with understanding donor identity.

Why do donors give?  Seems like a question worth knowing the answer to if you are in the business of trying to affect that giving behavior. One of the main reasons they give has nothing to do with your specific charitable brand but rather, their using your charitable brand to deliver on or otherwise reinforce […]

Learn More December 9, 2015

The Charity “Membership” Ruse

Imagine you signed up for an annual gym membership in January and paid with a check (or cash for the Mafioso readers).  Now further imagine that you also signed up for the gym’s “healthy eating” monthly email. What does the term annual connote to you?  What about membership?  Would you expect to have the gym […]

Learn More December 4, 2015

Is your nonprofit a “watch, observe and guess” organization or a “listen and act” one?

Donor transactional data tells you zero about “Why” something happened.  Maybe the sector doesn’t care… All the quantitative data from your website, email marketing tools, direct mail response data….opens, clicks, visits, time on site, response rate, conversion rate, social media shares and on and on and on. Al those reports slicing and dicing and creating […]

Learn More October 7, 2014

Stop the Direct Mail Testing

Is your direct mail testing on auto-pilot?  Are you testing out of habit?  We hear a lot of very smart, sophisticated direct marketers working for big non-profit brands tell us this. If you are one of them it is time to get off the merry-go-round and stop testing (with the current approach). These same marketers […]

Learn More September 25, 2014

The average UK charity is losing out on a 105% increase in lifetime value

Every year you spend time, money and resource trying to engage your donors in the hope that they’ll give more and stay longer. Yet frustratingly little ever changes for the better (though frequently for the worse!) Why’s nothing changing? Because our journeys are starting in the wrong place. Take your current ‘supporter journey’. What was […]

Learn More March 14, 2014

Why Your Analytics Is Costing You Time and Money

Modeling (or analytics) for selection is way overrated and much of the time it doesn’t beat a simple RFM bucketing in Excel.  What the sector really needs is a model for understanding but more on that in minute. The modeling (or analytics) for selection is about using transactional – and perhaps demographic or lifestyle data […]

Learn More February 3, 2014

Strategy Starts Where Your Comfort Level Ends

But, alas this is not how strategy is typically done. To start, we turn “strategy” the noun into an adjective (strategic) modifying “plan” or “planning”. This fateful, unintentional decision likely dooms any real strategy emerging. Instead, we end with a long, tedious document and an Excel file. The Excel document is some form of a […]

Learn More January 29, 2014

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!