• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Blog Post

Operation Smile reverses industry trend, actually increases retention rates

Listen to Associate Vice President, Jann Schultz (formerly) of Operation Smile explain how Donor Voice transformed their fundraising by giving her a donors view of her organization.

Learn More January 28, 2014

Donor Surveys are Crap. Or Are They?

We here it all the time from people with, as best we can tell, absolutely no background in survey research or quantitative analysis whatsoever.  Many of these people mask this lack of knowledge with an often wrong, never in doubt tonality. On the flipside, and in their defense, they have likely come across some really […]

Learn More November 4, 2013

A Dangerous Myth – Over-solicitation causes poor retention.

We don’t typically name names in these posts.  However, on occasion, it is required.  Penelope Burk, of Cygnus Research makes this claim,  “Over-soliciting and insisting on unrestricted gifts are largely why 65% of donors who make a first gift never make a second and why 90% or more donors who start giving are gone within […]

Learn More September 30, 2013

Stop trying to beat the control. Just build a better one to start with.

Snickers.  Tide Detergent.  Cheerios. What images do these branded products conjure up?  A candy bar, sure.  How about the color of the packaging?  Brown for Snickers, red for Tide, yellow for Cheerios. You may not even be a candy bar consumer and yet it’s likely you have a reasonably good recall of what the Snickers […]

Learn More July 11, 2013

Non Profit Premiums Are Literally Crack Cocaine – the Why and How of Stopping the “Drug Trade”

The Economist publication was first published in 1843 with the stated mission of “taking part in a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress”. Harsh?  Maybe.  Accurate?  Absolutely. A similar contest exists between academia and the real world, with the former having answers too many of the […]

Learn More February 6, 2013

The Non Profit Sector Needs More Debt…Seriously.

  The post title is a blatant attempt to generate interest.  That said, it is a true (if incomplete) statement.  What the sector is in desperate need of are markets; debt, equity, M&A markets.  In short, it needs buyers and sellers, creditors and equity holders.  In the commercial sector these are necessary financial tools for […]

Learn More January 11, 2013

Could the Commercial Sector Really Be THIS Wrong?

Fact: when it comes to measuring marketing performance, the nonprofit and commercial sectors are much more similar than they are different. Yes, bottom line revenue goes to different places but the way in which nonprofits and commercial counterparts evaluate effectiveness is through similar metrics; acquisition of new donors/customers, retention of donors/customers, lifetime value, etc. Given […]

Learn More December 13, 2012

Top 12 Reasons Why Fundraising Best Practices Suck

1)      Best Practices lead to copying 2)      Copying is a race to look the same 3)      When everything looks the same it is a commoditized market 4)      A commoditized market is very price sensitive 5)      A price sensitive offering can only improve margin through cost management 6)      By only focusing on cost management the innovation […]

Learn More November 30, 2012

What are those Facebook likes and Twitter followers worth?

Social media channels have not historically been the place where money changes hands.  In other words, Facebook is less the open air marketplace (think eBay) and more the Tuesday night book club and Saturday morning soccer gathering.  For proof, look no further than Facebook desperately, and unsuccessfully at the moment, trying to monetize 1 billion […]

Learn More October 29, 2012

How to (and not to) define a loyal donor

In the nonprofit sector this is most often defined by transactional variables, namely some combination of R (recency of last gift), F (frequency of giving) and M (monetary amount). The major problem is the almost tautological nature of the equation.  These are outcome measures on both sides of the equal sign.  This formula presumes (though […]

Learn More August 29, 2012

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!