• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Blog Post

DonorVoice PreTest Tool Webinar Deck

In this session you’ll learn about the two, inter-related problems of traditional direct mail testing: 1) The A/B road to infinity 2) Throwing out the Baby with the Bath Water Donor voice pretest tool webinar deck_final View more presentations from DonorVoice. and how to avoid both with a methodology and tool well established in the […]

Learn More February 9, 2012

Tips from commercial sector on Facebook engagement

Virtually every nonprofit has a Facebook page and most are probably still experimenting with content, metrics or both. There is some interesting research (from a Sept 2011 report from Buddy Media, NYC) on what works and what doesn’t to drive retail couponing on Facebook.  This is all about getting clicks, which is an outcome any […]

Learn More February 7, 2012

Want to know what donor centric should look like?

  This is a fantastic Rorschach test for nonprofits (courtesy of a London based shop, Targetbase Claydon Heeley). What do you see on the left side?  What do you see on the right side?  If the answer to the both has the words “cute” and/or “funny” then you’re human.  If both responses do NOT include […]

Learn More February 2, 2012

What is Important To Your Donors? Is This Even the Right Question?

What is important to your donors?  What keeps them as donors? Is the answer to these two questions the same?  Our answer is a definitive “it depends”. What is important can be very different if asked in a vacuum or depending on the context provided.  We’d argue however, that while asking in a vacuum is […]

Learn More February 1, 2012

Surveying Your Donors – Tips and How (not) To’s…

Up until this point, we’ve not blogged much on survey research design and best practices – a 101 or “how to” kind of post.  We are going to start now and hopefully, it is useful.  If not, speak up. A caveat upfront; our view is that survey research, especially questionnaire design and analysis is not […]

Learn More January 27, 2012

Is using the statistical average bad non profits?

Can a statistic be bad?  Maybe an overstatement but the Average, a universally used (but maybe not fully understood) statistic can sure hide a lot.  And without assigning malice or intent to the “hiding”, reliance on the average as an input to decision making can result in lots of bad outcomes. There are countless examples […]

Learn More January 24, 2012

Donor Segmentation – Why, How and What to Mail.

At DonorVoice we do a lot of segmentation work.  In our previous lives we did even more.  We love segmenting, slicing and dicing…And yet, we have seen far too many poorly conceived segmentation schemes and an equal number of well conceived ones that never get implemented.  Heck, we’ve even participated in both scenarios and hopefully […]

Learn More January 18, 2012

The Problem with Donor Satisfaction Programs are…the Very Satisfied

How is that blog headline for a man bites dog storyline?  This seemingly ridiculous claim becomes more credible if you consider, Customer (or Donor) satisfaction programs are mostly about remediating bad experiences. Most corporate entities use customer satisfaction to evaluate a given, isolated experience – e.g. a shopping trip, a call center interaction, an in-person […]

Learn More January 12, 2012

Word of Mouth – Who Does It and Why?

Word of mouth is, especially these days, considered the best form of advertising and promotion. It is inexpensive (not free) and often reported by peers as the most trusted, most acted on form of referral. Social media of course has elevated word of mouth or peer influence to rock star status. It is often useful, […]

Learn More January 10, 2012

Avoiding the Baby and the Bath Water Problem in Direct Mail Testing

We’ve written about the massive inefficiencies with the way direct mail testing is done today.  The high points are covered here.  One particularly odious problem is throwing out the baby with the bath water when the organization mails a test package with many (or more than 1 for that matter) test element – i.e. a […]

Learn More December 21, 2011

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!