• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Blog Post

What Makes Good Donors – Nature vs. Nuture?

Does anyone believe good donors are born versus created?  That some are inherently and fatalistically destined for philanthropic greatness while others are naturally predisposed against it?  Before you dismiss out of hand, there is some evidence that there is distribution for empathy and most folks have an “average” amount while other, smaller groups are at […]

Learn More December 13, 2011

Top 5 Reasons Non-Profits Should Avoid Net Promoter Score (NPS)

Before launching into the Top 5 allow us a brief trip down memory lane.  Remember the good old days when intent or willingness to do something like recommend a product, brand or service was a simple question including in many customer satisfaction surveys? If the willingness to recommend question has parents (weird thought, we know) […]

Learn More December 8, 2011

How to Brand a NonProfit – Focus on the 6P’s

The 4Ps from classic marketing textbooks include; Product, Placement, Promotion and Price.  We prefer adding two additional “Ps” for People and Processes. Contrast this with the two big dimensions often cited for branding – differentiation and relevance.  The problem with these two dimensions is not their original intent (which was as part of larger, more […]

Learn More December 5, 2011

Anatomy of a Committed Donor Infographic

We recently conducted some additional analyzes using our National sample of 1200 recent, frequent cause donors.  Here are some interesting nuggets to help build out a profile and understanding of the “generic”, Committed Donor. One other factoid, not referenced in the infographic is the relationship between race/ethnicity and Commitment – the answer; there isn’t a […]

Learn More November 30, 2011

Will anything get nonprofits more focused on retention? Doesn’t look like it…

Many have already blogged on a recent report from Adrian Sargeant (produced as part of a recent Blackbaud Summit). The report, a series of recommendations based on input from a wide variety of sources, is worthy of repeated reference. At DonorVoice, there is one recommendation worthy of reprinting in full along with some color commentary. […]

Learn More November 21, 2011

Why a Satisfied Donor is Not a Retained Donor

Satisfaction – as a concept or framework for loyalty has been around a long time.  It is, like most good ideas in the social sciences, based on a theory; exchange theory to be exact.  In a nutshell this theory suggests people make decisions in a rationale manner, weighing (subconsciously in many cases) the benefit and […]

Learn More November 15, 2011

Get the Report Ken Burnett Called Breakthrough and start increasing retention.

The DonorVoice point of view is quite simple; until non-profits focus as much on donor attitudes as they do behaviors, they will never fix the retention problem.  And until retention is addressed, non-profits will forever be dealing with a leakier bucket, one that cannot be re-filled fast enough. Why attitudes? Donor attitudes dictate why donors […]

Learn More November 11, 2011

Non-Profits Need A Cholesterol Test KPI

Consider the term, Key Performance Indicator.  The first two words are great – “key” connotes importance and an answer at the same time and it modifies a word that is very positive.  The “indicator” word is the real weak link. We should not tolerate an indicator that merely points to a problem and yet offers […]

Learn More November 10, 2011

Best Ask Amount? Consumer Pyschology Has Lot Answers.

Theories exist for a reason – to be tested and validated or discarded.  Those theories that are borne out can provide strategic road-maps for how to engage and drive optimum behaviors since they provide a point of view on how the world works.  With a point of view, one can establish measurement and with measurement, […]

Learn More November 3, 2011

Breaking News – Make Your Donors Move to Get More $ (or not)…

Donor behavior matters, a lot.  And since donor attitudes CAUSE donor behavior, we’d argue they matter, a lot.  Consider this our bastardized version of the transitive property… The two are however, very complementary with behavior providing the “who”  (i.e. targeting & selection) and attitudes providing the “why” (i.e. communications and marketing to educate, persuade and […]

Learn More November 1, 2011

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!