• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Blog Post

The massive (but fixable) problems with direct mail testing

See if this sounds at like your organization: The direct mail test ideas that actually make it into the mail stream are almost all incremental and rarely (mostly never) beat the control.  You spend enormous amounts of time and money coming up with test ideas, producing them and managing the logistics, only to have the […]

Learn More October 27, 2011

How (Dis) Loyal Donors Process Direct Mail from You and Your Competitors

Let’s first get a definitional piece addressed up front.  We define loyalty based on how Committed Donors are to a brand.  This is attitudinal loyalty, derived by what they think and feel about an organization and we have proven its link to donor behavior. A behavior based view of loyalty is often spurious.  Using both, […]

Learn More October 26, 2011

Donor Behavior AND Donor Attitudes – How they (should) work together.

Donor Behavior vs.AND Donor Attitudes It seems the vast majority of non-profits define loyalty based on past behavior.  And like the financial, Cover Your Ass (CYA) language in all prospectuses reminds us, past behavior is no guarantee of future performance. But neither of course is a purely attitudinal basis for segmenting and understanding your donor […]

Learn More October 24, 2011

Want to Increase Referrals & Donations? Start Listening to Donors.

We are big believers in the need for the non-profit space to catch up with its commercial brethren in soliciting and acting on donor feedback.  If we had a motto (and we don’t), it would be that non-profits need to start measuring and managing – i.e. acting on – donor attitudes with the same focus […]

Learn More October 18, 2011

Struggling with donations? To (mis) quote Carville, It is the brand, stupid.

A recent Harvard Business Review article, well written as usual, persuasive as usual, is nevertheless, an echo of likely thousands of articles and books before it.  The bold headline, “The Cure for the Non-Profit Crisis”, boils down to one central, oft-cited, oft-repeated admonition, Strategic focus is the key to success.  They use the term “coherence”, […]

Learn More October 14, 2011

1st gift to 2nd gift chasm – Why it exists and how to fix it.

Why is there such a precipitous fall-off between first and second gift, all but guaranteeing a negative rate of return on some 60% of first time donors?  There are a lot of answers to this question, many having to do with specific cultivation approaches and warnings to follow or not follow at one’s peril. And […]

Learn More October 11, 2011

Why are Major Gift Donors More Committed to Your Cause? Their Social Status, in part.

There is an interesting study, summary published here, that finds those high in social status are naturally more trusting of others.  Those high in social status also tend to be more affluent, be in a higher socioeconomic status and in general, be the types of donors you target for major giving. They may also be, […]

Learn More October 5, 2011

Chief Customer Officer in a Non-Profit? In a word, YES.

Jeanne Bliss, a customer relationship guru and author, has a great blog post arguing for the need for Chief Customer Officers.  Now the customer term means she is orienting her argument and focus on the commercial sector but before you dismiss it out of hand, take a look at these key questions she poses and […]

Learn More September 30, 2011

The Message Matters – A Lot, How to Link NonProfit Messaging to Bottom Line?

Do the specific messages used by a non-profit matter to retaining donors? Do the messages matter for getting the 2nd gift? How much do they matter? Which messages matter more or less and which ones not at all? The first two questions are admittedly rhetorical. Given the importance of the message knowing the answer to […]

Learn More September 28, 2011

Timeliness of Thank You’s or Personalization? If forced to choose, which should you definitely DO?

This post will almost certainly incite derision and maybe a few nods of agreement, probably means there is something here? In our recently released Donor Commitment Study (available for FREE download in the Resource section on this page) among 1200 recent, frequent, cause donors in the US we found an empirical, math based answer to […]

Learn More September 26, 2011

<< 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!