• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Putting The Lipstick On

A couple of posts back, we said, “The product matters“. In response, along comes Kathy Swayze with a comment saying what few fundraisers dare to say: “Your ‘quality of the product matters’ resonates. But how many fundraisers are stuck trying to put lipstick on a pig because the mission, focus and actions of their organization […]

Learn More October 25, 2011

Turn Fans Into Ambassadors

Our last two posts have talked about growing use of social nets amongst older cohorts. And while it’s great that nonprofits might be riding this wave to build ‘fan’ bases of one kind or another, the real challenge is to harness these fans, and the technology they’re getting comfortable with, to reach even more people. […]

Learn More September 20, 2011

Nielsen On Social Net Usage

Last week we gave you the latest Pew Research data on social net usage. Today we have even more social net data from Nielsen. Like Pew, Nielsen notes some especially strong growth amongst older demographics, in this case pointing out that internet users over age 55 are driving the growth of social networking through mobile […]

Learn More September 19, 2011

The Ideal Premium?

Ideally, no premium. Seth Godin has been promoting End Malaria the past couple of days, and here explains the case for that fundraising initiative using a book premium. He says the book is better than a tote bag. Now, I’m not a fan of premiums, period. Yes, I know they can lift response (not always), […]

Learn More September 8, 2011

WWF Gets It Right, Almost

Jeff Brooks at Future Fundraising Now can be pretty scathing when he blogs about nonprofit ads that don’t work. Here’s his latest diatribe, where he notes that World Wildlife Fund UK is a frequent ‘bad ad’ culprit. But redemption might be possible. As reported on MediaPost, here’s an ad from WWF that I think is […]

Learn More August 19, 2011

Fundraising & Water Moccasins

I received an email yesterday from Jeff Brooks, the mega-smart, mega-iconoclastic editor of the FutureFundraisingNow blog. He wanted to know what grievances Tom and I had against an Australian fundraiser named Sean Triner ‘cause  someone using the email address the_agitator@gmail.com was saying some very disparaging things about Sean on Jeff’s blog. Frankly, neither Tom nor […]

Learn More July 12, 2011

Selling Nuts To Squirrels

Here’s a gem from marketing guru Seth Godin. In Selling Nuts To Squirrels, he argues that “most organizations shouldn’t try to change the worldview of the audience they’re marketing to.” ‘Worldview’ as interpreted by Godin affects three critical things in the marketing equation: “… attention, bias and vernacular. Attention, because we choose to pay attention […]

Learn More June 6, 2011

Better Donor Newsletters

The Agitator promised more examples of good work in our editorial calendar for the year. How about this one? Donor relationship consultant Lisa Sargent shares this case study on a donor newsletter overhaul she and designer Sandie Collette performed for Merchants Quay Ireland. You can check out the ‘before’ and ‘after’ versions. Condensed below are […]

Learn More March 14, 2011

Eden Springs Promotion – You Judge

Here’s one for you cause marketers out there. Eden Springs supplies 416 million litres of water per year across sixteen European countries. They tout their ‘clean, green’ credentials. They’ve launched this promotion aimed at individuals who are using personal social net sites to raise money for their favourite causes and charities. In briefest terms, as […]

Learn More March 11, 2011

Are You Relevant?

Here’s an important exercise every nonprofit should go through periodically. Some fundraisers are content to play with the hand they are dealt. If that’s working, count your blessings. Others, upon finding the ‘same old’ has lost its relevance, push to re-shuffle the deck. Remember, marketing your nonprofit is not merely about the packaging and the […]

Learn More February 11, 2011

<< 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 … 18 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!