• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Simplicity Marketing

The mantra on advertising’s Madison Avenue these days is ‘simple’. This NY Times article headlines the point: Paring Down Marketing Messages to a Few Simple Basics. Columnist Stuart Elliott says marketers are reacting to three trends: “how busy life today seems, the growing complexity of technology and the increasingly complicated economic picture. That has encouraged […]

Learn More July 30, 2012

Top Nonprofit Brands

Nonprofit curator Joanne Fritz at About.com recently did this write-up on the top nonprofit brands … at least as identified by the 2012 Harris Poll Equitrend Study. The organizations in the survey were measured across a number of traits such as familiarity, intent to give, emotional appeal, volunteerism, etc. The top nonprofits are those that […]

Learn More July 19, 2012

Stand Out

Roger began the week with some recommendations for salvaging fundraising bottom lines in the reminder of the year. #1 was Get Your Message Together. You might say, “No-brainer”. If that’s the case, why, as Roger notes, echoing other bloggers, do nonprofits do it so poorly? #2 was Get Your Online House in Order. You must […]

Learn More July 13, 2012

Fundraising And ‘HENRYs’

‘HENRY’ stands for Higher Earning, Not Rich Yet. These are folks earning $100-$250k, although this includes a lot of two-income households. I used to be one; however, now I’m neither higher earning nor rich … nor likely to be. Disqualified. But I digress. This article, The Return of the Newly Affluent, describes some of the […]

Learn More June 28, 2012

Looking For Retention In All The Wrong Places

Tom’s  post yesterday, Nonprofits and the Customer Experience not only warrants reading a second time, but I also feel compelled to pile on some more emphasis and detail because it goes right to the heart of retention and donor value. Tom writes: “In the commercial marketing arena, there’s heaps of chat about the ‘customer experience’ […]

Learn More April 13, 2012

Lessons From Komen Versus PPFA

A final comment on this affair … Learn from it! Follow some of these accounts of how Komen is responding (or should): From Holly Hall at the Chronicle of Philanthropy From the Washington Post From social media commentator Erik Sass From blogger Kivi Leroux Miller, a play-by-play I’m sure there will be more. This affair […]

Learn More February 7, 2012

Komen Versus Planned Parenthood

Officially The Agitator is a blog about nonprofit fundraising and communications. So I’m recommending you read Getting Attention’s Nancy Schwartz’s excellent analysis of the Komen vs. Planned Parenthood debacle from the perspective of what makes for effective (and ineffective communications) and smart fundraising (on Planned Parenthood’s part) in response to threat. Tom P.S. Stuff ’em […]

Learn More February 3, 2012

First Things First

Seth Godin offers a valuable reminder in his recent post, Accentuating Differences. He’s talking about a sin I know I’ve committed in the past. He warns that as a marketer you can become so focused on differentiating your offering from your competitors that you forget the need to address your prospect’s first option … which […]

Learn More November 8, 2011

Give Locally

comScore has just published a study on how consumers are coping with the continuing recession and the impact this is having on brand loyalty. Their conclusion is signaled in the title: The Effects of the Recession on Brand Loyalty and ‘Buy Down’ Behavior: 2011 Update. (registration required to download study) What they find is that […]

Learn More November 7, 2011

Isn’t It Nice To Win?

The winner for Most Innovative Fundraising Campaign at the recent International Fundraising Congress was Diankonie Frankfurt, for a campaign called Help the Oma (grandmothers). The campaign actually sought to enlist volunteers to help with Diakonie’s various social service programs. [I hope I’m reasonably accurate … my German isn’t what it used to be!] Here’s the […]

Learn More October 31, 2011

<< 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 … 18 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!