• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Behavioral Science Posts

The Revolution Should Be Tested

My inbox occasionally delivers a gem that’s just right for a timely post. Today, a longtime Agitator reader passed one along I can’t resist sharing.  It starts off… MEMORANDUM To:  High-Level Direct Marketers Who Are Political Conservatives (if this is not you, please do a friend a favor and pass it on). FROM: Richard A. […]

Learn More September 17, 2021

Are You Creating Pain for Your Donors?

My email inbox is still sore from its Labor Day weekend workout. As predicted a hyperbolic tsunami of email flooded forth from candidates and causes on both ends of the political spectrum.  Failure to respond would result in an end to the world,  a more dangerous and rapid rise in fascism (or socialism), and basically […]

Learn More September 8, 2021

Past Behavior Predicts Future Behavior – Who Cares?

This post’s title largely summarizes my view.  Past giving predicts future giving and so begins the circular logic of donor understanding.  It’s akin to noting that someone is on time because they tend to be punctual. Knowing that past behavior predicts future behavior can make you more efficient but you can efficient your way out […]

Learn More August 30, 2021

The Shape of a Good Story

Everyone’s got a story. If only this were true.  In our extensive review of fundraising copy we find the sector copy reads more like an academic journal than an involving work of fiction.   In case you’re wondering, the latter produces more reading and giving. The story part of the sector’s writing is especially weak. So, […]

Learn More August 25, 2021

The Now or Never Effect

Faux deadlines are a stock in trade for online fundraising. “Faux” because most organizations will  take every penny that comes in past the deadline and even if there is a match thrown in to juice the offer  – e.g. give by Date X and your gift will be matched. But does it work?  And “work” […]

Learn More August 16, 2021

Engagement Lessons From a Dating App

Badoo is a dating app with almost half a billion registered users worldwide and 300,000 new, daily sign ups.  But the dating app biz is  a crowded space with low barriers to trying other dating apps, low barriers to exit and thefore, high promiscuity (had to, sorry). So, customer acquisition is only as good as […]

Learn More July 26, 2021

To Social Proof or Not Social Proof, That is NOT the Question

Sorry Shakespeare.   Now get me to a soapbox. Does anyone think they aren’t influenced by what other people do?   What else explains 80’s hairstyles? Of course you’re influenced by others.  Equally inarguable is the direction of influence (I copy what those people do, I do the opposite) and degree (no influence, mild, moderate, heavy) differ […]

Learn More July 23, 2021

Is Preaching to Your Choir Turning Off Everyone–Including the Choir?

“We should all be less prejudiced.” Does this statement and point of view sit well with you?  Maybe it matches your beliefs.  Maybe you think it’s so obviously correct that it’s like saying water is wet; it’s almost factual and certainly unobjectionable. What about this sentiment?  “You are free to choose to value non-prejudice. “ […]

Learn More July 9, 2021

Turning Vision Into Reality — Update on CopyOptimizer

Because it’s been a year since Kevin first unveiled  CopyOptimizer™ this is an appropriate time for an update. His dream was creation of an online tool to help everyone–including you and me– write better, more effective copy. Anyhow, that vision has now turned into a reality. Lots of fundraisers are currently alpha testing it. I’ve come to recognize its immense value—especially where email is concerned.  By and large the quality of copy where email is concerned is downright dreadful.  Not healthy, especially when more and more organizations are relying […]

Learn More June 7, 2021

Personality and The Words You Use

The University of Cambridge has a demo app predicting your personality on the Big Five based on word usage vis-a-vis your social media accounts. It’s quite accurate on seemingly very little data – I only linked to my infrequently used and only in a professional capacity, Twitter account.  You’d think that’d be a biased sample […]

Learn More June 2, 2021

<< 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 … 132 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!