• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Behavioral Science Posts

The Revolution Should Be Tested

My inbox occasionally delivers a gem that’s just right for a timely post. Today, a longtime Agitator reader passed one along I can’t resist sharing.  It starts off… MEMORANDUM To:  High-Level Direct Marketers Who Are Political Conservatives (if this is not you, please do a friend a favor and pass it on). FROM: Richard A. […]

Learn More September 17, 2021

Are You Creating Pain for Your Donors?

My email inbox is still sore from its Labor Day weekend workout. As predicted a hyperbolic tsunami of email flooded forth from candidates and causes on both ends of the political spectrum.  Failure to respond would result in an end to the world,  a more dangerous and rapid rise in fascism (or socialism), and basically […]

Learn More September 8, 2021

Past Behavior Predicts Future Behavior – Who Cares?

This post’s title largely summarizes my view.  Past giving predicts future giving and so begins the circular logic of donor understanding.  It’s akin to noting that someone is on time because they tend to be punctual. Knowing that past behavior predicts future behavior can make you more efficient but you can efficient your way out […]

Learn More August 30, 2021

The Shape of a Good Story

Everyone’s got a story. If only this were true.  In our extensive review of fundraising copy we find the sector copy reads more like an academic journal than an involving work of fiction.   In case you’re wondering, the latter produces more reading and giving. The story part of the sector’s writing is especially weak. So, […]

Learn More August 25, 2021

The Now or Never Effect

Faux deadlines are a stock in trade for online fundraising. “Faux” because most organizations will  take every penny that comes in past the deadline and even if there is a match thrown in to juice the offer  – e.g. give by Date X and your gift will be matched. But does it work?  And “work” […]

Learn More August 16, 2021

Engagement Lessons From a Dating App

Badoo is a dating app with almost half a billion registered users worldwide and 300,000 new, daily sign ups.  But the dating app biz is  a crowded space with low barriers to trying other dating apps, low barriers to exit and thefore, high promiscuity (had to, sorry). So, customer acquisition is only as good as […]

Learn More July 26, 2021

To Social Proof or Not Social Proof, That is NOT the Question

Sorry Shakespeare.   Now get me to a soapbox. Does anyone think they aren’t influenced by what other people do?   What else explains 80’s hairstyles? Of course you’re influenced by others.  Equally inarguable is the direction of influence (I copy what those people do, I do the opposite) and degree (no influence, mild, moderate, heavy) differ […]

Learn More July 23, 2021

Is Preaching to Your Choir Turning Off Everyone–Including the Choir?

“We should all be less prejudiced.” Does this statement and point of view sit well with you?  Maybe it matches your beliefs.  Maybe you think it’s so obviously correct that it’s like saying water is wet; it’s almost factual and certainly unobjectionable. What about this sentiment?  “You are free to choose to value non-prejudice. “ […]

Learn More July 9, 2021

Turning Vision Into Reality — Update on CopyOptimizer

Because it’s been a year since Kevin first unveiled  CopyOptimizer™ this is an appropriate time for an update. His dream was creation of an online tool to help everyone–including you and me– write better, more effective copy. Anyhow, that vision has now turned into a reality. Lots of fundraisers are currently alpha testing it. I’ve come to recognize its immense value—especially where email is concerned.  By and large the quality of copy where email is concerned is downright dreadful.  Not healthy, especially when more and more organizations are relying […]

Learn More June 7, 2021

Personality and The Words You Use

The University of Cambridge has a demo app predicting your personality on the Big Five based on word usage vis-a-vis your social media accounts. It’s quite accurate on seemingly very little data – I only linked to my infrequently used and only in a professional capacity, Twitter account.  You’d think that’d be a biased sample […]

Learn More June 2, 2021

<< 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 … 132 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!