• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Behavioral Science Posts

Does Using Bullsh$% Language Help or Hurt Giving?

I read a lot of academic studies.  A lot.  Most teeter on the edge of uninteresting, a rare few are truly breakthrough that cause us to re-think our thinking.  None however, until now, read like a spoof article from The Onion.  The title of that study is, “Bullshit-sensitivity predicts prosocial behavior”. I read the abstract […]

Learn More November 16, 2020

The Social Movement Dilemma

Social activism and creating a “movement” is hard work, made harder by a conflicting reality.  More extreme actions, often effective at gaining (media) attention and increasing pressure on organizations or institutions, are also likely to reduce popular support. What constitutes ‘extreme’?  Perhaps it’s in the eye of the beholder and context dependent.  Blocking highways may […]

Learn More November 4, 2020

The Power of a Personal, Unexpected Thank You

I’m certain the U.S. 2020 Election won’t stop on November 4th. But I am hopeful that the torrent of urgent emails, urgent text messages and urgent phone calls will at least decrease to a garden hose flow, as opposed to a fire hose flood. A necessary part of this year’s process has been the flood […]

Learn More November 2, 2020

How To Write a Case for Support in One Week

Surprisingly few fundraisers –and boards, and CEOs and Comms directors—truly understand the difference between a Mission Statement: “Why we do what we do?” …a Vision Statement: “How things will be better.” …and a Case Statement: “Why should the donor care?” So, it’s not surprising that Tom Ahern on the first page of the first chapter […]

Learn More October 30, 2020

A Missing Ingredient To Raising More Money – Donor Personality

Imagine running a digital ad or doing a list select for the mail and only being able to select a single attribute or audience parameter – e.g. age, geography, political affiliation. My bet is most fundraisers would probably choose an attribute from  Facebook or Google or a data co-op that indicated past charitable behavior. Now, […]

Learn More October 26, 2020

Should You Put the Next Dollar on Brand Building or Direct Response?

The answer is $.60 on brand, $.40 on direct response. Why? Because, as the curve below shows, that  60:40 split produces the optimum long-term benefit. The most financially beneficial, long-term effects are about growth, defined as profit and market share, not volume growth which is often a short-term activity delivering little to no improvement in […]

Learn More September 21, 2020

Why Does Wikipedia Keep Doing It Like This?

For years now, as part of the donation request, Wikipedia informs us that most don’t give and acknowledges that most will ignore this request. As a behavioral scientist, I’m puzzled why they keep using this message and if they’ve ever tested it. Behavioral science is now very popular – maybe too popular for its own […]

Learn More September 14, 2020

Trump’s or Biden’s Convention Speech: Which Was Better?

There are myriad ways to answer that question. We chose to stay above the opining fray and analyzed each speech based on linguistic features using our Copy Optimizer. As a refresher, the Copy Optimizer analyzes parts of speech by tagging each word and using algorithms to ‘dimensionalize” parts of speech on two continuums, Involving vs. […]

Learn More August 31, 2020

Going Postal

I live a split existence.  Part of my day is devoted to writing copy aimed at defeating Donald Trump and helping the people he harms.  The other part is devoted to ferreting out information and insights I hope are of empirical help to you and other Agitator readers. This professional paradox is certainly present when […]

Learn More August 28, 2020

Back to The Future

Marketing scholars had the chance to work with a local chapter of a national health charity.  This is their story. The local chapter in Texas had limited funds and internal capacity and despite this, or perhaps because of it, the academics were able to experiment. The academic’s situation analysis revealed the following challenges, An uninformed […]

Learn More August 21, 2020

<< 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 … 132 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!