• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Better Face-2-Face Through Feedback

Tom’s piece on Donor Loyalty should remind us all of how little information we really have when it comes to understanding the commitment and loyalty of individual donors. As a result most fundraisers rely on conjecture and so-called ‘best practices’. We look at brand surveys, surveys of general donor populations and organization-specific donors hoping to […]

Learn More February 24, 2016

Do Donors Want To Be Loyal?

Rummaging through some old files on a completely unrelated mission, I stumbled upon some interesting data from a comprehensive donor survey conducted for a prominent national US nonprofit a decade ago. In view of the relentless hammering away The Agitator does on donor retention, I thought it might be worthwhile to share a couple of […]

Learn More February 23, 2016

Read. Repeat.

Agitator readers in the U.S. who took last Monday off to celebrate Presidents’ Day missed a real gem. So first thing today, go back and read Tom’s post, Become a Youtility, based on Claire Axelrad’s brilliant piece in NonProfit Pro. In a nutshell that post and the links embedded in it covers everything The Agitator’s been preaching […]

Learn More February 19, 2016

Hug Your Haters

In my Monday post, Become A Youtility, I talked about marketing guru Jay Baer’s notion that good marketing is all about helping the customer, versus selling to him or her. Jay takes his point a step further, talking about customer service in this great podcast — Hug Your Haters — put together by Marketing Profs […]

Learn More February 18, 2016

How To Say ‘Thank You’

Rory Green, FundraiserGrrl, has done all of us a big favor by sharing some findings regarding donor ‘thank you’s’, with two great examples of doing it right. By now, you’ve heard plenty of stats regarding the importance of timely and personal ‘thank you’s’. But the stat that stuck out for Rory was this: only 47% […]

Learn More February 17, 2016

Become A Youtility

Today I followed a couple of links that led me, late bloomer that I am, to this ‘new’ word: Youtility. It’s a nifty term, capturing a concept that all fundraisers should have embraced by now. I started with Claire Axelrad’s great seductive headline — Want to Guarantee Fundraising Success? Dive Into These 5 Fundamentals. So I […]

Learn More February 15, 2016

We Need A World Of Betty Humphries

Here is one of the most fantastic letters you’ll ever read. I’m so happy that Hilborn Charity eNews has shared it. It’s written by 10-year-old Betty Humphries (but soon to be 11 as she points out in her letter), who was inspired to apply for the job of chief executive of Greenpeace. The outgoing chief, […]

Learn More February 12, 2016

Is Your Organization Really Donor-Centric?

There’s a quick test to determine whether a fundraising organization is truly donor-centered or not. Sadly, most groups fail the test … miserably. The test is simple: who in the fundraising/communications department has the most power? If, as is so often claimed (“we’re donor-centric”), the donor is truly the king or queen, then power will […]

Learn More February 8, 2016

Follow The Man In The Suit

I saw this headline — 9 Valuable Shortcuts to Influence Nonprofit Donors — on a recent Claire Axelrad article and set off to read it in a huff. “Claire, you know better than that,” I thought as I waited for the download. “You know donor relationships must be built over time, as trust and commitment […]

Learn More January 28, 2016

Is Channel Integration Worth It?

Lots of fundraisers talk about integration. Few truly practice it well. And even fewer view its possibilities through the lens of practicality. This is why Australian fundraiser Sean Triner’s post To Integrate or Not To Integrate: That is the Question is a ‘must read’ — and a ‘must share’ among the silos in your organization. (Of course […]

Learn More January 27, 2016

<< 1 … 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 … 132 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!