• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Routine vs. WOW!

Unless you’re Caitlyn Jenner or Barack Obama, is this the way your day full of experiences generally goes? Routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, WOW!  Routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, WOW!  Routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, WOW!  Routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine, routine … Good night! Three WOW’s and 35 routine’s. I’m not saying you lead a boring life. I’m just saying that each day you probably endure heaps of ‘average’ experiences. Average products, […]

Learn More June 3, 2015

They’re Looking At Us!

Most of the time, when I write about our commercial marketing brethren, I’m talking about stuff they’re doing that we in the nonprofit sector might learn from. Today, the tables are turned. I’ve noticed two articles lately from commercial guys praising nonprofit marketing efforts. Here’s what they like. The first article, by direct marketer Bob […]

Learn More May 27, 2015

Smartphones: Part 2, Marketing Advice

OK, so you’ve heard plenty of stats by now regarding mobile phone usage. And if you haven’t, just check out yesterday’s Agitator post — Smartphones: Part 1, The Data — featuring comprehensive data from Pew Research. But just to underscore once more the importance of mobile, here are some stats via the Center for Media […]

Learn More May 20, 2015

Smartphones: Part 1, The Data

Today is the first of two overview articles on smartphones, marketing and fundraising. This first article deals with smartphone ownership and usage in the US. [I would expect similar patterns in the other countries where Agitator readers tend to congregate.] Tomorrow I’ll turn to marketing implications, featuring two or three ‘guide’ resources I think fundraisers will […]

Learn More May 19, 2015

REPEAT! Take This To Your Board & CEO Today!

“Here’s your disturbing wake-up call for Monday, September 17th …” That’s how The Agitator started its week nearly 3 years ago. That post — Take This to Your Board & CEO Today! — warned of the tsunami-like wave of major media stories spotlighting questionable fundraising practices and alerted readers that great damage was in store […]

Learn More May 18, 2015

Have I Mentioned Online Video Before?

Yes. Probably enough to make you think I own stock in one of the major online video platforms, like Brightcove or Akamai  [I don’t; but with 7 billion plus videos watched every day on YouTube and Facebook, I wish I could buy some.] OK, so I’m addicted. I don’t think a day goes by that […]

Learn More May 12, 2015

What Your Donor Can Do For You

In this era of donor-centrism, we’re all (rightfully) focused on our donors, the experience we give them, the stories we tell them, the transparency we promise them, and our commitment to listen to them and respect their preferences. All good. But is it exclusively about delivering for them? Is it inappropriate to expect anything from a donor […]

Learn More May 7, 2015

Are Donors And Nonprofits ‘Misaligned’?

In his four-part series — Raise More, Ask Less — Roger made a plea: listen to your donors and honor their preferences. Even if this suggests hitting them with fewer fundraising appeals. Indeed, Roger offered ‘contrarian’ evidence that asking less can actually yield more money. You can review Roger’s case here — Part 1, Part 2, […]

Learn More May 5, 2015

Words vs Video

I love words. I’ve made most of my career out of educating and persuading people through words. And yes, with an occasional photo or graphic to back me up. But now there’s video … but not just video … online video. YouTube just announced that its year-over-year growth in daily visitors is up 40%. And the […]

Learn More May 1, 2015

Thinking Like For-Profits

I spend a heap of time watching how for-profits market their services and wares, looking for nuggets of insight, research or technique that might have applicability in our nonprofit space. My cherry-picking goals are usually modest — how is the commercial world employing a new platform like mobile, how are they earning a return from customer […]

Learn More April 29, 2015

<< 1 … 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 … 132 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!