• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Do I Have Your Attention?

In a recent post, marketing maven Seth Godin makes this observation: “Attention is a bit like real estate, in that they’re not making any more of it. Unlike real estate, though, it keeps going up in value.” Of course he’s not the only commentator to stress the point that ‘attention’ is the scarcest and most […]

Learn More July 6, 2011

Older And Crankier

As you could tell from his article yesterday, Roger’s getting a bit older and crankier. So he’s inspired today’s post from his much younger colleague, which is all about how marketers should communicate — or not communicate — with and about older people. And as we all know, most nonprofit donations come from older people. […]

Learn More June 30, 2011

Different Shapes And Sizes

When I read the comments Agitator readers make on our posts, I realize the huge diversity of our readership. I just finished ‘moderating’ two recent comments that indicate the huge spread in reader interest and focus. Both are brief, so I’ll re-publish here to underscore a point. Comment #1 from Kristen Smith at People For […]

Learn More June 14, 2011

Twitter Update From Pew

I’m alerting you to this report reluctantly, because I’m a Twitter avoider. But Pew Research says 13% of online Americans — 19% in the biggest using 25-34 year-old cohort — now use the service, so I guess it’s my duty. Usage goes up with education! UGH! Tom

Learn More June 13, 2011

The Social Habit

The Social Habit is a study of social media usage by Edison Research and Arbitron. Some interesting findings … 52% of Americans 12+ have a profile on one or more social networks. This figure is driven largely by Facebook, which is now used by over half (51%) of Americans 12+. Twitter is as familiar to […]

Learn More June 10, 2011

5 Stages Of Social Media Growth

Here is an interesting — and a bit amusing — depiction of social media evolution in large organizations, as seen by research firm Forrester. The process of ‘social maturation’ for social media utilization … 1. Dormant stage — one in five companies don’t use social media. 2. Small victories — baby steps and case studies. […]

Learn More June 8, 2011

Selling Nuts To Squirrels – II

Same lead as yesterday’s Agitator post … In Selling Nuts To Squirrels, Seth Godin argues that “most organizations shouldn’t try to change the worldview of the audience they’re marketing to.” What if he changed “organizations” to “consultants”?! ‘Worldview’ as interpreted by Godin affects three critical things in the marketing equation: “… attention, bias and vernacular. […]

Learn More June 7, 2011

Selling Nuts To Squirrels

Here’s a gem from marketing guru Seth Godin. In Selling Nuts To Squirrels, he argues that “most organizations shouldn’t try to change the worldview of the audience they’re marketing to.” ‘Worldview’ as interpreted by Godin affects three critical things in the marketing equation: “… attention, bias and vernacular. Attention, because we choose to pay attention […]

Learn More June 6, 2011

Using Video To Support Your Cause

Here’s a short piece — with great examples — from the Chronicle of Philanthropy on using online video to engage your donors and generate new support. The recommended uses … 1. Put a face on your cause … people embrace people. 2. Tear down walls … bring supporters inside your organization and its projects. 3. […]

Learn More May 27, 2011

‘Cause Fatigue’ On Social Media?

Interesting new research on causes and social media from Georgetown University’s Center for Social Impact Communication, reported in Philanthropy Today. While four in ten Americans get involved with groups working on social and political causes, 17% of women and 12% of men do so through social media sites, by joining a cause group, posting a […]

Learn More May 24, 2011

<< 1 … 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 … 132 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!