• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Direct Mail Package 101

An experienced direct mail copywriter, with a proven track record, can command thousands of dollars for creating a direct mail package. But of course that investment can — should — pay off in spades when the returns start piling up. Especially for prospecting packages that survive as controls … sometimes for years. [I’ve often wondered […]

Learn More April 29, 2011

Online Personalization Builds Loyalty

About nine months ago, The Agitator noted the online approach taken by CARE International in the UK. There, with mycarezone.org, personalized online reporting of the charity’s results connects donors with the specific projects they initially joined to support. This approach cut attrition amongst face-to-face acquired donors in half. The same agency behind that strategy, Bluefrog, […]

Learn More April 27, 2011

More Direct Mail Test Results

I love testing! Every marketer/fundraiser should have an addiction to testing built into their genes. Here are some tests reported on SOFII by Willis Turner, senior copywriter at Huntsinger & Jeffer. His examples — all dealing with direct mail acquisition packages — cover … Two-color vs four-color carrier Short vs long letter Mailing labels gift […]

Learn More April 26, 2011

Two Online Campaigns We Like

Our content has been pretty heavy the past few days. This is a bit lighter. Just two campaigns we’ve noticed and like. From Greenpeace, a Facebook campaign, targeting Facebook … Unfriend Coal. Read about it in this article from the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Over 80,000 comments in 24 hours … possibly the Facebook world record. […]

Learn More April 22, 2011

Acquiring New Donors – Plan C

Yesterday, in our ongoing discussion of the acquisition-retention linkage, we presented acquisition Plan B, from one of our readers. In brief, that model says use online and mobile media to capture as many impulse givers as possible … do this over and over … and don’t aspire to renew these folks. It is in the […]

Learn More April 21, 2011

Acquiring New Donors – Plan B

The Agitator has talked a lot in the last week or so about donor retention … and in particular, how to get that crucial second gift. That discussion drew some comments about, in effect, the quality of new donors entering the cultivation pipeline in the first place. So I wrote New Donors … Garbage In, […]

Learn More April 20, 2011

Donor Retention Survey Results

Nothing fancy about last week’s Agitator survey. We asked one question: “What percentage of your nonprofit’s 1st time donors make a second gift?” [Folks at agencies and consultants were asked to indicate an average over the clients they’ve typically served.] Here are the results … 31% — Less than 30% 31% — 30% to 39% […]

Learn More April 19, 2011

How To Retain 70% Of New Donors

Before acquiring new donors, learn how to cultivate the ones you have. In a nutshell, that’s the challenge posed by one of the respondents to The Agitator’s donor retention survey. [BTW, two more days for you to take the survey.] I’m reproducing Stephen Best’s entire response below, not because I necessarily want you to stop […]

Learn More April 14, 2011

Repeat Donors Always Welcome

This week, I’m going to wear you down on the subject of retaining donors! It’s THAT important. Here’s more advice on how to hang on to them … this time from Bill Peck of Organizational Solutions, writing in Philanthropy Journal. Bill’s recommendations (amplified here): Send a timely thank you letter within five to seven business […]

Learn More April 13, 2011

Welcome Advice

I mean just that … courtesy of Fundraising Success. From Craig DePole at Newport Creative Communications, here’s some very straightforward advice on how to welcome your new donors. In brief (if your nonprofit’s first year retention rate is less than 40%, I suggest you read the whole article): Make it timely. Make it personal … […]

Learn More April 11, 2011

<< 1 … 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 … 132 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!