• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Behavioral Science Posts

Biases and Nudges Work Differently for Different People

Do we sound like a broken record?  People are different and yet we treat them all the same. I’m desperate to understand why this is as it’s been this way a long time and maybe that’s both the issue and the reason.   A long time means a lot of well-worn habits and resistance to change […]

Learn More June 3, 2022

Calling all Copywriters

Your words matter.  Anybody saying people don’t read copy hasn’t done a copy test to prove they do.  Heck, we’ve done seemingly really minor copy tweaks and seen that matters.  Subject line testing anyone? All copywriters know the copy needs to be simple and relatable.  It should read like a personal letter or conversation. And […]

Learn More May 23, 2022

Could Your Storytelling Use Some Help?

A story well told lights up the same parts of the brain as if we experienced it directly.  That’s powerful.  But telling me to use stories and showing lots of examples is like expecting me to pick up a foreign language by watching a foreign language movie.   I need a lot more specific instruction and […]

Learn More May 13, 2022

Does Your Copy Feel Personal and Readable?

NextAfter has run and published more email test results than you can shake a stick at.  What have they learned?  More conversational and natural copy wins.   A water is wet finding?  Maybe, but there is a big difference between believing this or knowing it and having copy that does it well.   Our sample […]

Learn More May 11, 2022

We Don’t Write So Good. And How to Easily Fix It

This is the cover page of the co-branded, jointly produced report on the state of email copy from NextAfter and DonorVoice. In this case, you can judge the book by its cover.  It’s a large email sample and the report is visually appealing, easy to read and easy to find nuggets of goodness. One of […]

Learn More May 9, 2022

Which Words Do Females Know Better Than Males?

We admittedly geek out on the scientific study of words, linguistics.  We’ve built the CopyOptimizer tool to score copy on Readability and Storytelling using linguistics. We believe writing is more work, effort, training, study and process than divine inspiration and stroke of genius, hence tools and rubrics that turn writing into more science, less art. […]

Learn More April 4, 2022

The Exquisite Corpse of Direct Mail

If direct mail is dead it’s one hell of an exquisite corpse. And, with each passing week it grows even more exquisite. Not that it’s ever died; just grown more valuable, important, and increasingly informed by more and more science. We’ve been on the direct mail soap box a long time, particularly urging small to […]

Learn More March 9, 2022

Model-T Fundraising: Pros and Cons

“Any customer can have a car painted any color that he wants, so long as it is black.” –Henry Ford The Model T Ford, America’s first mass production auto,  only came in black because the production line required compromise so that efficiency and improved quality could be achieved. The service is provided by a score […]

Learn More February 28, 2022

How to Invoke Sad Without Saying “Sad”

“She was sad.”  Boooorrrrring. Talk about telling not showing.  Something so important as emotion and yet, most of the time we reduce it to the lowest common denominator, literal use of the word;  angry, sad, happy. How about this instead; “she was crying.”   It shows, it describes.  And for most of you, it likely […]

Learn More February 23, 2022

The Best Story Wins

It’s not the best ideas or the most innovative thinking or the best ground game or operational plan.  It’s story. The charitable organization world is one  with almost no barrier to entry and massive, diminishing returns.  The number of nonprofits has skyrocketed while the number of people giving has dwindled. You don’t need a new […]

Learn More January 19, 2022

<< 1 2 3 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!