• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

The Fudge Factor

Prompted by the Agitator’s piece on The Power of Reciprocity, our friend Ken Burnett checked in from the U.K. to answer our request that readers share some examples of how ‘reciprocity’ has helped their fundraising. Ken’s example, drawn from his forthcoming book, Storytelling Can Change the World, tells of his first-ever fundraising experience and a […]

Learn More July 29, 2014

Everything Is NOT Awesome

Agitator readers know I have this obsession with online video. Only yesterday I was writing about it. Sooner or later, one of you will take me to task and tell me to get over it already. But every time I get ready to wax eloquent over putting the donor at the center of fundraising, or […]

Learn More July 25, 2014

Do You Really Want Intelligent Donors?

Editors’ Note:  If you don’t subscribe to Tom Ahern’s blog, Luggage Is My Life, you should. Tom produces some great stuff.  Today we’re reprinting his most recent fundraising post in its entirety. How many words are typically required to describe your nonprofit’s mission to a donor? [  ] 2 [  ] 50 [  ] 250 […]

Learn More July 23, 2014

Play It Again, Sam

In his recent Fundraising Success post, premiere copywriter Willis Turner talks about repetition. As in, when it your fundraising package works, use it again. And again. Until it fails. As he puts it: “…don’t be afraid of repetition unless and until it proves itself a bad idea for your particular organization. There’s too much to […]

Learn More June 24, 2014

10 Tips For Successful Donor Testimonials

Kim Wallace, co-author of the fascinating Why People Don’t Buy Things, just posted a terrific guide to making and using Donor Testimonials. Not only does Kim explain why donor testimonials are so effective, he also illustrates his points on producing outstanding testimonials with this video collection of the real things. Here are Kim’s 10 tips […]

Learn More June 20, 2014

Sadvertising

Writing in Fundraising Success recently, Angie Moore riffed off an article in Fast Company titled, The Rise of Sadvertising: Why Brands Are Determined to Make You Cry. At the top of her piece, Angie wrote: “…you would think emotional advertising is something new. I’m not making fun of the article — I actually found it […]

Learn More June 10, 2014

Emotion vs Logic — The Economists Weigh In

Late last month we stated what is obvious to any direct response fundraiser: emotion trumps logic. Most Agitator readers readily agreed. And the scriveners over at FutureFundraising Now and Ahern Communications looked up from their illuminated manuscripts and smiled knowingly. But now, the economists have weighed in with proof positive. Well, positive and negative. Life […]

Learn More June 4, 2014

Selling Socks

In a recent Fundraising Success post, Angie Moore asked: “Are you marketing and raising funds the right way for today’s donors?” She went on to discuss ‘outward-focused’ and ‘inward-focused’ marketing, using these definitions: Outward-focused: This type of marketing and sales is focused primarily on identifying the needs of the customers and matching the products and […]

Learn More May 28, 2014

Being Creative

Roger and I are always going on about innovation. Here’s a reminder post, but try searching ‘innovation’ on The Agitator website for plenty more. Being innovative means being creative. And what are the prerequisites of being creative? According to humorist John Cleese, there are five necessary conditions … Space — away from your usual pressures […]

Learn More May 23, 2014

Let’s Hear It For Ugly

Our pal Jeff Brooks just wrote a post on ugly. Jeff loves ugly and he disses a poor donor prospect who tweeted that he had refused to respond to an email appeal because it was poorly designed. Here’s how Jeff defends ugly: “That’s the way fundraising goes: Ugly works. Tacky works. Corny, embarrassing, and messy […]

Learn More May 9, 2014

<< 1 … 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 … 55 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!