• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Worst Client Comments

Here’s some Friday fun for our agency/consultant readers. A couple of Irish creatives decided to enlist others of their ilk and design some posters to illustrate the worst client feedback they’d received on their work. They started selling the posters (proceeds to charity) and were swamped by orders. Here are the posters. And ‘fess up’ […]

Learn More May 31, 2013

I Wish I’d Thought Of That

Our UK fundraising mate, Ken Burnett, asked The Agitator to mention the upcoming SOFII event … I Wish I’d Thought Of That. IWITOT. You can register here. It’s in London on the 6th of June. Which means that not many of our main army of US fundraisers are likely to be there! But Roger and […]

Learn More May 30, 2013

To Hell With Facts

  Image by Tim Gruber     Jeff Brooks’ brilliant Fundraiser’s Guide to Irresistible Communications features an essential chapter titled, “Persuade with Story, not Statistics.” Jeff warns:  “We’re all tempted to marshal facts and send them out like an army to battle people into being generous. That doesn’t work. If you want people to give, […]

Learn More May 16, 2013

More On Personal Touch

Yesterday we talked about the power of the Post-it note. Today, something even more powerful … handwriting. [Online fundraisers can tune out now.] Here’s a paean to handwriting by copywriter Karen Zapp: Why Direct Mail — the more personal the better — Will Not Die. Karen asks: “Would you send a sympathy card with a […]

Learn More May 14, 2013

Watch Your Pictures!

I subscribe to “Which Test Won” — a feed that proselytizes for A/B testing — both for the fun of testing my own instincts (and often disagreeing with their analysis) and just to remind myself that tweaks of copy, design and imagery, based upon testing, indeed matter. Here’s a recent test (actually a replay from […]

Learn More May 9, 2013

Golden Rules For Your Reply Form

Yesterday we passed along some pointers regarding converting online leads. One of the key bits of advice was not to direct someone responding to your online appeal to your website homepage. The appeal should link directly to a ‘purpose-built’ landing page … no distractions, direct reinforcement of your original (motivating) message, immediate closure of transaction. […]

Learn More May 8, 2013

‘No Sale’ Oxfam Video

Agitators readers know I’m a sucker for online videos to deliver important messages and sell causes and charities. See here and here in the past week alone! But this one from Oxfam is a ‘No Sale’ as far as I’m concerned. Yes, I applaud the use of crowdsourcing to generate mission-related video. Huge potential for […]

Learn More April 23, 2013

DoGooder Video Awards

We’ve been talking about visual impact this week on The Agitator, so I suppose it fitting that we close out with this item on the winners of the 2013 DoGooder Video Awards, sponsored by the Nonprofit Technology Network (NTEN), YouTube, see3, and Cisco. Best of Nonprofit Video Award — Follow the Frog (Rainforest Alliance) Funny […]

Learn More April 19, 2013

Seeing Is Believing

A number of items crossed my screen in the last week or so that underscored the power of visual presentation. First I saw this promotional email from DirectMarketingIQ that featured a number of publications I intend to browse … Visual Marketing, by David Langton & Anita Campbell Infographics: The Power of Visual Storytelling, by Jason […]

Learn More April 16, 2013

We Love Ourselves

Admit it. That’s what marketing guru Seth Godin says. And the best brand stories help the customer/donor do that. Says Godin: “We love the memory we have of how that brand made us feel once. We love that it reminds us of our mom, or growing up, or our first kiss. We support a charity […]

Learn More April 15, 2013

<< 1 … 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 … 55 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!