• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

“Will You Puhleeeeze Take This Call?”

No mode of fundraising takes more hard knocks than telemarketing. If telemarketers haven’t ruined your exquisitely timed dinner, then you’ve probably at least read the horror stories where 99.9% of the funds raised go to the telemarketer. Roger keeps promising that he’ll write a post on the positive fundraising contribution of telemarketing. Maybe this guest […]

Learn More November 20, 2012

Fundraising Needs An Emotional Revolution

Francesco Ambrogetti, fundraising advisor for UNAIDS in Geneva, recently made a strong case for an “emotional revolution” in fundraising in this article written for 101 Fundraising … Cry me a river: WHY and HOW emotions can save fundraising and the nonprofit world. Any fundraiser worth his or her salt knows the driving power of emotions. […]

Learn More November 9, 2012

Words Are Precision Tools

Roger might have overwhelmed you with numbers and analysis in his recent two detailed posts on acquisition and lifetime value, here and here. I’ll grossly oversimplify what he established with the numbers. It boils down to embracing this mindset: Treat a first-time giver as a lead, not a donor. If you then deal with these […]

Learn More October 25, 2012

Basic Is Beautiful

Cleaning out my tips file, I came across two pieces of recent advice that are pretty basic, but all the more reason to be reinforced! From Margaret Battistelli Gardner at Fundraising Success, 5 Direct Mail Fundraising Musts: 1. Tell stories, stories, stories. 2. Make sure premiums are tied to your mission. 3. Test, test and […]

Learn More October 9, 2012

Getting Inside Your Donor’s Right Brain

I’ve been really struggling to actually like my Kindle reader. Perhaps I chose the wrong book to get excited about e-readers … my first real attempt is The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, by British neuropsychiatrist Iain McGilchrist. I can assure you, the problem is not […]

Learn More October 8, 2012

Fundraising & Advocacy Campaigns In A Box

We’ve just added a remarkable widget to The Agitator Toolbox that strikes us as a dream come true for fundraisers and action campaigners in this age of mobile and video. And judging from the response rates I’ve seen, it’s not only remarkable but powerful as well. It’s called “Spark” and it functions like a mini-website […]

Learn More October 1, 2012

Who Are You Writing To?

All the great fundraising copywriters agree on one key piece of advice … construct a very clear archetypal image (demographically, psychographically, culturally) of the individual you are writing to, and then write as though you were speaking to that person face-to-face. Most fundraising copywriters these days probably have in their mind’s eye some version of […]

Learn More September 24, 2012

The Boomer Brain

Here via Ad Age are some tips from the neuroscientists at Nielsen Neurofocus on communicating to Boomers … you know, the people with 70% of the net worth in America. According to Neurofocus … Color Within the Lines: Boomers can have trouble processing visual presentations that are too complex, and fail to see stuff around […]

Learn More September 21, 2012

The Six Envelope Hot Spots

The other elements of a direct mail package can be weak — or even fail — yet the package can succeed. The single exception of course is the envelope! An envelope that is opened is 100% successful; a mailing that is unopened is a 100% failure. Do you know the six outer envelope ‘hot spots’? […]

Learn More September 14, 2012

Coca-Cola Fundraising

Each afternoon at around 2:30 the daily gem-filled missive from Jeff Brook’s Future Fundraising Now arrives in my e-mailbox. Part wit, part iconoclast, almost always spot on, Jeff is merciless on much of the foolishness – branding studies, focus groups, ‘creative’ advertising, laborious organization-centered copy – that destroys effective fundraising. Last week a special treat […]

Learn More September 5, 2012

<< 1 … 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 … 55 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!