• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Demographics

Pew, Pew, Pew!

The Agitator just can't say enough good things about the various Pew Research arms. If you collect a paycheck from a nonprofit group and do not regularly follow the various studies of these folks on Americans' media habits, on attitudes of various demographic segments about public issues, about trends in media coverage, you oughta be […]

Learn More January 12, 2007

Giving Totals for 2006

In case you missed it over the holidays, a survey for the Wall Street Journal conducted by Harris Interactive found that 83% of Americans contributed to a charity in 2006, with average total giving of $1220 (down about a hundred bucks from 2005). Here are the categories used, with percentage of respondents giving to each. […]

Learn More January 2, 2007

What is the Web 2.0 Anyway? And Who Cares?

From our archives. Happy Holidays! For those of you for whom sorting your email is a major tech challenge, all the buzz over “Web 2.0” must be a real mystery. For most pundits, the concept revolves around “user-generated content” posted out there on the web for all to see. Of course, an email is user-generated […]

Learn More December 26, 2006

Homo Broadbandicus

Actually, according to market research firm Media-Screen (as reported by Clickz Network), among the 57 million Americans with broadband access, five distinct sub-species of broadband users have been identified. Which are you? Content King: values entertainment Social Clicker: values communications Fast Tracker: values news and information Everyday Pro: values online personal productivity tools Online Insider: […]

Learn More November 19, 2006

42 Million And Counting

Earlier we reported that Hispanic Heritage Month is underway, and provided a potpourri of pertinent data on our U.S. Hispanic population for fundraisers and communicators. Here's a special new compilation of U.S. Census data on Hispanics put together by the Pew Hispanic Center. We're going to keep throwing this data at you, because you need […]

Learn More October 1, 2006

Your Most Important Hire

If you’re serious about raising money and selling your agenda today, the most important individual on your marketing team is your webmaster. And if you’re serious about raising money and selling your agenda five or more years out (and hopefully that’s not too far beyond your planning horizon), make sure this individual has their own […]

Learn More September 29, 2006

Latino America Celebrates

This weekend begins a month of recognition of the Hispanic heritage of America's 42 million Latinos. For those who should be thinking about how this segment of America might be enlisted in your cause or charity, here are a few useful articles and sources. The Hispanic Population — One Market or Many? provides a concise […]

Learn More September 15, 2006

Why the Smorgasbord?

If you’ve browsed The Agitator, you might be puzzled by its breadth of topics — blogging, online fundraising, generational issues, direct mail, Latino media, branding, podcasting, planned giving, online videos, relationship marketing, social networking, environmentalism, major donors, video games, integrated marketing and more. Are we confused? Unfocused? No. We think we are reflecting the rapidly […]

Learn More August 31, 2006

Weekend Quiz #2

As reported in the New York Times, the Census Bureau has released new data detailing the accelerating growth of immigrants living in America. These changing demographics — the number of immigrants living in American households rose 16% over the last five years — will undoubtedly affect politics and cause advocacy before long. There are already […]

Learn More August 19, 2006

<< 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!