• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

OK, “Thank You!”

I’d like to say “Thank you” to all the readers who commented on my controversial No “Thank You” post of last week. I do so noting there’s no empirical evidence that thanking you will make you more likely to comment again! For suggesting that maybe “Thank you’s” to donors don’t matter, some of you concluded […]

Learn More April 24, 2012

8 ‘Duh’ Principles Of Direct Marketing

We fundraisers all have our ‘Duh!’ moments, often when we realize we’ve violated some cardinal rule of practice. Many Agitator readers responded ‘DUH!’ to my post yesterday, asking whether anyone knew, based on empirical evidence, whether thanking donors actually increased their subsequent giving. Don’t worry … I’ll return to that subject next week! But here’s […]

Learn More April 20, 2012

No “Thank You”!

We have met the Wizard of Oz, and not only is he just another poor slob, he wears no clothes! Here is a ‘must read’ blog post by Chuck English at Marketing That Works … regarding Thank You’s. Chuck started out by posing what I know he expected would be a question with a very […]

Learn More April 19, 2012

He Had Leathery Hands

Or should it be: “He had strong hands”? Here’s one for the copywriters and wordsmiths in our audience. In a NY Times article, Your Brain on Fiction, Annie Murphy Paul (author of Origins: How the Nine Months Before Birth Shape the Rest of Our Lives) writes about neuroscience research on how word  imagery affects our […]

Learn More March 20, 2012

Coca-Cola, Fundraising and the DMA

I’ll get to Coca-Cola in a moment. First, I want to report on a wonderfully hopeful undercurrent of innovation and change that I sensed at last week’s Direct Marketing Association Nonprofit Conference in Washington, D.C. Although the undercurrent has not yet reached tsunami or even riptide proportions, it is increasingly evident that concepts long talked […]

Learn More March 5, 2012

Don’t Waste Their Time

One of the worst things you can do to a donor is waste their time. I was reminded of that reading this article about marketing to the affluent. But it’s not just the affluent who are time deficient. It’s everybody! How do you waste a donor’s time? By sending them something that’s not: #1 Relevant […]

Learn More February 23, 2012

Online Fundraising: Red-headed Stepchild?

Agitator readers tend to reveal their true passion more often through direct emails to me and Roger than via public comments. Here’s an example, name removed, on a topic that might stir your juices. “Hello Agitator Editor, I am an online fundraising professional who has been in the “business” for almost 10 years now. I […]

Learn More February 21, 2012

Was It The Envelope?

“The letter seems OK, let’s test another carrier!” You heard that — maybe said it — before. It occurred to me as I was listening to this Ethan Boldt (Direct Marketing IQ) video reviewing a new carrier format he thinks will light up response rates. One example is from Obama for America 2012; the other […]

Learn More February 8, 2012

Direct mail: How To Beat The Control

Donor acquisition is entering its 6th year of a prolonged and steady slump for most organizations. And probably another year of playing the blame game —“poor lists”, “weak economy”, “increased competition” — won’t make things better. Neither will ordering your copywriters, no matter how talented, to “beat the control” be of any help. After 40+ […]

Learn More February 1, 2012

Best Of The Best Fundraising Campaigns

From SOFII, aggregator of proven fundraising materials and insights, here is their list of the “23 all time great fundraising campaigns”. Each comes with a link describing or illustrating the campaign. I have two favorites on this list … The UNICEF card that launched that’s organization’s fundraising in 1946 — just because it’s so iconic. […]

Learn More January 24, 2012

<< 1 … 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 … 45 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!