• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Direct mail

Real Fundraisers Don’t Whine, Worry or Wait

That’s why today we’re launching a new feature: The Agitator Toolbox of Innovation. There’s simply too much good stuff going on out there to spend time dithering about whether or when the economy will rebound, for boards to come to their senses … or whatever folks spend their time worrying about. Usually, things over which […]

Learn More January 19, 2012

Rekindle Your Donor’s Thrill of Giving

Mark Phillips at UK’s Bluefrog has nailed it with this post, called Why giving to charity can be like buying a Polaris submarine. Boy can I identify with drooling over those comic book offers when I was a kid. I never tried to order the seven foot Polaris sub big enough for 2 kids (after […]

Learn More January 11, 2012

Resolved: No Fundraising Silos

As we noted last week, the superb comments offered by readers of The Agitator are a delight to me and Roger. And we’re gratified that these have grown strongly in number over the past year. So we thought it fitting to give the last word of the year to an Agitator Commentator. We picked this […]

Learn More December 30, 2011

Useful (And Otherwise) Tips

Time for year-end housecleaning. A few recent tip sheets to pass along. For the very practical … 12+ Tips for Creating Engaging Envelopes, courtesy of Direct Marketing IQ. For social net addicts (one in every five minutes spent online involves social networking) … Top 10 Need-to-Knows About Social Networking and Where It’s Headed, from comScore. […]

Learn More December 28, 2011

Fundraising Year In Review

This is the first of two posts on the year now ending. Today, a summary of giving for 2011 and some trends in direct mail.  Tomorrow, the 2011 Pulse of Agitator readers. As we head for 2011’s fundraising finish line The Atlas of Giving on Friday reported that overall giving this year will finish 7.4% […]

Learn More December 20, 2011

Online ‘Fundraising’ A Misnomer?

A couple of small items caught my attention lately regarding online fundraising, mostly because they re-raised in my mind the question of what actually constitutes ‘online fundraising’. One was a short blog post by Jeff Brooks, Why it’s hard to raise funds online. Citing Smart Insights Digital Marketing blog, Jeff says it takes: 3 seconds […]

Learn More December 19, 2011

Which Mailbox Delivers Emotion?

Here’s a good study to read to follow-up on Roger’s post this week about multi-channel integration. Done by Epsilon, the Consumer Channel Preference Study (registration required) focuses particularly on consumer preferences with respect to direct mail and email. But it also looks at social media and mobile. (One disappointment … nothing on telemarketing.) Some findings: […]

Learn More December 15, 2011

Are Online Fundraisers Stealing Credit?

Am I seriously behind the curve? Or asleep at the wheel? Or is old age just chipping away at my memory? Whatever. I don’t think I’ve ever seen numbers like these … Way back in September 2010 a donor survey was conducted by Campbell Rinker for Dunham + Company, a US fundraising consulting firm. The […]

Learn More December 1, 2011

Flat Earth Fundraising: Asking Amounts

I’m truly not old enough to remember when physicians abandoned the use of leeches. But, I am old enough to recall the origins of asking amounts. The year was 1970. Computers – big mainframes, not PC’s and The Cloud – had just begun to edge out the heavy, old metal Addressograph plates and the traditional […]

Learn More November 14, 2011

We’re Stoked!

Roger and I have just seen the latest CBS News/NY Times poll that says 43% of Americans agree with the views of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. Only 27% disagree; 30% are unsure. As reported by CBS News’ Political Hotsheet: “While there are different agendas within the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement, nearly all of the […]

Learn More October 28, 2011

<< 1 … 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 … 45 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!