• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Direct mail

More on Blackbaud’s Online/Offline Fundraising

Roger was fairly strident in his Wednesday post commenting on Blackbaud’s latest Target Analytics benchmark report on online fundraising. His assessment is that fundraisers just don’t ‘get it’ — and maybe don’t even care — when it comes to the importance of integrating online and offline fundraising channels. Some of our responders talked about the […]

Learn More June 3, 2011

Online Ghost Haunts All Fundraisers

Target Analytics released its 2011 Benchmark Study of Internet and Multi-Channel Giving yesterday. I suspect their findings will be like playing Mozart to a cow … expecting appreciation and receiving only blank stares. But, more on that in a minute. In a nutshell, here’s what Target Analytics found in their benchmarking of the online/offline — […]

Learn More June 1, 2011

This Headline Terrified Me

Charity Wins Donors With Promise Never to Ask For Another Gift When I saw this headline on Holly Hall’s Chronicle of Philanthropy article on Monday I groaned out loud, and added an expletive. What a recipe for fundraising disaster, I thought. No way direct response fundraising works without repeat gifts (i.e., repeat solicitations). Then I […]

Learn More May 25, 2011

Facebook Versus Real Money

Yesterday we noted Facebook’s new Resource section for nonprofits, and quoted FB’s own figure of $5 million being raised through its Causes application. Laudable. But one Agitator reader noted with a hint of sarcasm … $5 million in five years from some 50 million Facebook users wasn’t exactly a fundraising avalanche! Then another commentator noted […]

Learn More May 20, 2011

Magic Fundraising Machine At Work

Roger’s post yesterday is well on its way to being one of The Agitator’s ‘most-read’ ever. How could it not be — Magic Fundraising Machine Boosts ROI. What self-respecting fundraiser could resist a claim like that?! Numerous readers have emailed The Agitator, asking Roger to open his trench coat … “show me the money”! We’re […]

Learn More May 13, 2011

Magic Fundraising Machine Boosts ROI

For years I’ve been quietly steaming about two inventions that I suspect have done great damage to effective direct mail fundraising. Even calling them out will make me seem like a Luddite, a curmudgeon or worse. But truly, I haven’t lost my mind, so bear with me. The first technological culprit is Microsoft’s “Excel”, or […]

Learn More May 12, 2011

Is Anybody PURLing?

I’ve been doing some reading on the integration of direct mail (as simple as postcards) and online response — e.g., 8 Key Takeaways for Personalized URLs. As you probably know, the same data that you would use to personalize a direct mail package can be used to generate complementary web pages unique to each respondent. […]

Learn More May 5, 2011

More Copywriting Lessons

Given that we’ve been commenting on copywriting lately, I’ll continue down that path with these two observations from How the Web Makes Direct Mail Better by Douglas Broward of Grizzard Communications, writing originally in Convio’s Connection Cafe. First, on direct mail copywriters learning from the web world … ” … reading — still the most […]

Learn More May 3, 2011

The Role Of Sex In Fundraising

Poor Tom. Battered by Agitator readers (rightfully!), all in response to his Direct Mail Package 101 post offering the healthy admonition to use good copy produced by good copywriters. Unfortunately, he neglected to cite any female copywriters. I know for a fact that Tom isn’t a copy misogynist. For the nearly 40 years we’ve worked […]

Learn More May 2, 2011

Direct Mail Package 101

An experienced direct mail copywriter, with a proven track record, can command thousands of dollars for creating a direct mail package. But of course that investment can — should — pay off in spades when the returns start piling up. Especially for prospecting packages that survive as controls … sometimes for years. [I’ve often wondered […]

Learn More April 29, 2011

<< 1 … 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 … 45 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!