• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Direct mail

Is Direct Mail Dead? Craver Responds

In case you missed, The Agitator’s own Roger Craver talked about the "death of direct mail" and related fundraising issues yesterday as guest on "Live Discussions," sponsored by the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Here’s the transcript. Tom

Learn More March 6, 2008

Acquisition Best Practices

Recently, in The Baby and the Bathwater, Roger wrote about the disturbing industry-wide decline in new donor acquisition, as documented by Target Analysis Group. He discussed this trend in the context of predictions of the death of direct mail. We don't want to just leave you wringing your hands! Here is a very helpful piece […]

Learn More February 1, 2008

The Baby and The Bathwater

Last week the fundraising, marketing and communications blogs were abuzz over the current state of fundraising and marketing in the non-profit world. The firestorm was mostly centered on the question of whether direct mail is dying, dead or simply changing and what to do about it. Well, if direct mail is dead it’s one exquisite […]

Learn More January 15, 2008

Seven Fundraising Myths

Mal Warwick has made my blogging job easy today. I shamelessly admit it. Mal's latest newsletter (DEC) contains two “must read” articles. First, guest contributor Bob Knight (runs a direct marketing agency) posits seven precepts of (mostly) direct mail fundraising and takes his shots at them. Here are what Bob calls myths: The list is […]

Learn More December 5, 2007

Direct Mail Dinosaur Advice On Online Fundraising

Just like the title says, here are five useful tips on online fundraising from avowed direct mail dinosaur Karen Taggart at care2. Read the details here. 1. Segment your file. 2. Incorporate variable ask strings. 3. Code, code, and code some more. 4. Analyze your returns at the end of a series. 5. Evaluate success […]

Learn More November 19, 2007

The $90,425 Direct Mail Donor

In his November newsletter, direct mail maven Mal Warwick tells this story. A donor makes a first gift of $5 in response to an advocacy group in 1984. Then makes 25 more gifts over the next 22 years, totaling $425. Then makes a bequest of $90,000 in 2007! Many — maybe most — major charities […]

Learn More November 8, 2007

WARNING: Here Comes the Direct Mail Temperance Union

No sooner had we filed yesterday's post reporting that online fundraising may account for only 1% to 5% of total non-profit contributions than our inbox revealed the latest attack on a major fundraising workhorse — Direct Mail. On top of our stack was a piece by Laura Novak in the New York Times titled “For-Profit […]

Learn More September 14, 2007

American Optimism Suits 2007 Fundraising

Pew Research Center recently published survey findings regarding Americans’ attitudes about their financial prospects for the coming year. If optimism equates with donor largesse, nonprofits should be in for a good 2007. Some key findings: About four-in-ten American adults say they are living comfortably, while another three-in-ten say they have enough money to meet expenses […]

Learn More January 22, 2007

<< 1 … 39 40 41 42 43 44 45

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!