Donor Centricity

Your Donor Retention Lesson in 117 Seconds

At last! Houston fundraiser Evan Wildstein has creatively captured some key do’s and don’ts of donor care that’s taken taken us years, dozens of posts and pages of rants to convey. For this acoustic accomplishment we present Evan the last Agitator Raise of 2020 and recommend you follow his insights on Twitter @wildevanstein; and also […]

Learn More December 28, 2020

How to Know If Your TM or F2F Sustainer Acquisition Meets Donor Needs

Over forty years of research and theory show people have three basic, psychological needs. Satisfying these needs makes donors more likely to stick around. The three are: Competence – feelings of effectiveness. For donors, it could mean feeling like they’re making a positive difference. It could also mean learning something new, for example, information about […]

Learn More December 11, 2020

Identifiable Victim: Better Than Stats; Except When It Isn’t…

Universal truths are universally wrong. This is never more true than when talking about ‘nudges’ from the world of behavioral economics. As the only behavioral science agency in fundraising and with an entire team of social scientists, some of whom are behavioral economists, we are huge advocates of the field and discipline. But… behavioral economics […]

Learn More December 4, 2020

Does Your Donor Service Deliver “WOW!”?

Giving Tuesday– in the midst of a pandemic– coupled with notice of the tragic death of Tony Hsieh, founder and former CEO of Zappos, the online shoe seller, reminds me that more than ever it’s again time hammer home the importance of great Donor Service. (Of course, the first step will be to promptly and […]

Learn More December 2, 2020

The Power of a Personal, Unexpected Thank You

I’m certain the U.S. 2020 Election won’t stop on November 4th. But I am hopeful that the torrent of urgent emails, urgent text messages and urgent phone calls will at least decrease to a garden hose flow, as opposed to a fire hose flood. A necessary part of this year’s process has been the flood […]

Learn More November 2, 2020

How To Write a Case for Support in One Week

Surprisingly few fundraisers –and boards, and CEOs and Comms directors—truly understand the difference between a Mission Statement: “Why we do what we do?” …a Vision Statement: “How things will be better.” …and a Case Statement: “Why should the donor care?” So, it’s not surprising that Tom Ahern on the first page of the first chapter […]

Learn More October 30, 2020

Pumpkin Pie and the Recipe for Year-End Giving

Lots of fundraising sin and excuses are gonna be assigned this year to the pandemic. Not the least of which will be the failure to adequately prime the stewardship pump for year-end giving. “We just didn’t have the budget” …” Didn’t want to bother our donors.” …” The board wouldn’t let us.” And on and […]

Learn More October 23, 2020

The “Donor” Identity is Lame

I’m a woman and a coffee lover. But being a coffee lover isn’t one of the most important ways I define myself, while being a woman is. This simplistic example illustrates the difference between identity presence, whether one has a certain identity, and identity importance, how central that identity is for their sense of self. […]

Learn More October 9, 2020

Deliberate Giving?

One. That’s likely the modal number of gift frequency for (cash, one-off) donors on your file. The average gifts per donor per year is ballpark 1.7. Really strong charities are slightly north of 2 and lousy ones are hovering a few tenths below the average. If you get cash donors to give twice per year […]

Learn More October 5, 2020

How Do You Get Conservatives to Care As Much as Liberals About the Environment?

Answer: message to them differently. More specifically, conservatives and liberals can see themselves as equally moral (Identity) but for very different reasons. Much like there is a Big 5 of Personality that is trait-based and predictive of attitudes and beliefs (and in turn, behavior), there is another Big 5 in Morality that, not surprisingly, has […]

Learn More September 25, 2020

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

Behavioral Science Q & A

Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

Read Full Answer

Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

Read Full Answer

Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

Read Full Answer

Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

Read Full Answer

Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

Read Full Answer

Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

Read Full Answer