• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Breaking Out of the Status Quo

Demographics: The Second-Best Way to Segment Your File

Yes, demographics are the second-best way to segment. The best way, however, is literally almost any other way. Take, for example, the experience of Todd Yellin, Netflix’s VP of Product Innovation.   Netflix has one of the great treasure troves of data out there.  What does he use?  Quote: “There’s a mountain of data that […]

Learn More January 25, 2018

Explaining Abstract Numerical Concepts–Like “Eleven”– To Your Boss

Any discussion of metrics in The Agitator must include a nod to “The Curse of Fundraising Innumeracy” about an Agitator reader who tried to keep a straight face when someone said they had a 95% retention rate.  And clearly there is a problem when otherwise smart people with big budgets don’t “do” numbers. But I’d like […]

Learn More January 22, 2018

The Behavioral Science of Fundraising Metrics

You’ve heard us talk about applying behavioral science to help nudge donors in the right direction  with topics like: Symmetrically structuring your symbolic gifts The desire to complete sets and goals What happens in your brain as you donate Using the fresh start effect Creating exceptions to mental accounting How to frame your matching gift […]

Learn More January 19, 2018

The Two Fundraising Metrics That Matter Most

Tomorrow, we’ll talk about those metrics you should eliminate with extreme prejudice.  So it’s only fitting that we should talk about those metrics you’ll want to embrace and socialize in your organization – Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) . First, I should mention that DonorTrends is offering Agitator readers a free test drive of their excellent […]

Learn More January 17, 2018

Are You Playing the Fundraising Lottery?

One of my favorite country music singer/songwriters is Brandy Clark. As we kick off this Agitator series on Fundraising Metrics  I’m going to invoke Brandy because her song Pray to Jesus reflects the approach to decision making by all too many fundraisers unfamiliar with simple metrics, simple calculations. Brandy writes: “Cause there ain’t but two […]

Learn More January 16, 2018

TESTING: Go Beyond Individual Communications

When you want to find out if your control package could be beaten, you test a different communication against it. So how do you test if your direct marketing program could be better?  Clearly, you test a different program against it. For some this is a scary thought: it’s hard enough to deliver on one […]

Learn More January 5, 2018

TESTING: When A/B Tests Attack (your results)

In yesterday’s post we talked about when A/B tests show results, but all that’s really there is noise. Today, we’ll flip that on its head: sometimes an A/B test shows no result, but there’s an important finding just below the surface. An example of this is a great study by Karlan and Wood looking at whether […]

Learn More January 4, 2018

We Know Where You Live

“You have only 6 days left to help meet our 16 for 1 matching gift challenge.  If we don’t hear from you by midnight Sunday we’re coming after you.  AND…we know where you live.” Now that the Christmas carols are fading and the wrapping paper has found it’s way to the trash bag, we can […]

Learn More December 26, 2017

Gobsmacked!

Yesterday’s gem from Mark Phillips and the folks at Bluefrog illustrates the length to which some organizations go to abuse donors.  It’s behavior like this that landed UK fundraising in such a mess.  On the flip side, one of the highlights of 2017 — a major effort intended to counter donor abuse and dig UK fundraising […]

Learn More December 19, 2017

The Same Old Santa

In my 50 years of writing fundraising copy I’ve yet to hear of a donor saying, “Hey, that’s the same appeal you sent me last year!” Yet too many fundraisers worry (often out loud and in endless meetings) and drive copywriters nuts with screwball briefings like “we need something new and different for this year-end […]

Learn More December 15, 2017

<< 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 … 86 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!