• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

Donor Data, Feedback And Service

The Agitator is delighted when more resources are put on the table with regard to donor retention. Here’s a white paper that Hilborn Charity recently pointed us to (thanks folks!). And it’s a small world, we were pleased to see that our DonorVoice colleague Kevin Schulman participated in the webinar that provided the grist for this […]

Learn More April 21, 2015

Raise More, Ask Less — Part 4

If you aren’t going to lose your job or your sleep over flat performance or no growth, then you should simply continue with the simple and convenient status quo. However, please understand there are other nonprofits that are going beyond the conventional, making changes in mindsets and methods and boosting results and growth. And they […]

Learn More April 17, 2015

Raise More, Ask Less — Part 3

At this point it’s abundantly clear that simple ‘ask more, make more’ is a broken or at least badly dented concept—especially for those organizations that engage in 15 or more appeals/asks with their donors each year. (For those still struggling to get their CEOs or Boards to buy in to a schedule of 3, 4 […]

Learn More April 16, 2015

Raise More, Ask Less — Part 2

Can you really raise more money by asking fewer times? Absolutely. Or so argues Kevin Schulman in his paper aimed at stirring the pot for our Agitator discussion. Download the paper here. There are at least two ways to do this. One fairly simple. The other more effective, but requiring a bit more work and […]

Learn More April 15, 2015

Raise More, Ask Less — Part 1

I’ve been around long enough to know the unmistakable squeal of conventional wisdom being challenged. So, when my St. Patrick’s Day post — Are You Abusing Your Donors? — triggered a barrage of comments and protestations pro and con I knew some nerves had been struck. And it wasn’t because of leprechauns or green beer. It was […]

Learn More April 14, 2015

Fixing Hidden Leaks #2: Donation Pages And Payment Systems

When it comes to gathering online contributions, all you learned in Monday’s How to Write Good post is worthless if your donation pages and payment systems suck. Never in my pontificating life did I dream I’d be down into the weeds exploring such minutiae. But hey, the life of a fundraising pundit sometimes must involve detail. […]

Learn More April 9, 2015

Fixing Hidden Leaks #1: How To Write Good

At the end of my post — The Hidden Cost of Complexity — I promised a series of posts on donor usability. Why? Because the sector spends millions of dollars and hours creating complexity. Complexity that drives donors away. Out they go through the leaky self-created holes in the retention bucket. Let’s start with the […]

Learn More April 6, 2015

Chasing The Unicorn

On April 1st Jeff Brooks alerted us to the next game-changer in fundraising with his glorious post, The Wah Generation. On April 2nd Tom weighed in with a post titled Haunting Fundraising Questions, wondering about the future. His post was liberally salted with points by Pamela Barden zeroing in some key questions we all should be asking, but […]

Learn More April 3, 2015

The Hidden Cost Of Complexity

Given a choice, the harder something is to use the less people will use it. The more difficult something is to read the fewer people will read it. Most organizations don’t bother measuring the difficulty donors have in using their online donate pages. Nor do they bother measuring the readability of what they write and […]

Learn More March 27, 2015

What’s In A Job Title?

We all know that job titles can be either very misleading, sometimes actually disguising — and often overstating — what the person really does with their time (‘Chief Executive’, for example), or on the other hand, helpfully precise (e.g., Production Manager, Direct Mail). To get a sense of the range of people who are reading The Agitator, […]

Learn More March 24, 2015

<< 1 … 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 … 86 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!