• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

What Is ‘Donacanto Serto’?

No, it’s not an Italian dessert wine, Tom! In Esperanto, the international auxiliary language, ‘donacanto sperto’ translates into ‘donor experience’. And whether used by fundraisers speaking Esperanto, French, Spanish, German, English or Urdu, this buzzword raises the legitimate questions: “What is it?” and “Why should I care?” I suspect no one is quite sure because […]

Learn More February 9, 2015

You’ve Been Weeded!

Suppose a donor said this to you … “I’ve decided to weed my giving garden. I’ve been giving faithfully to a dozen organizations, but I’m going to cut back by the end of the year to six at most. Why should you be one of those six? Take your time; I don’t need the answer […]

Learn More February 6, 2015

But Why?

Let me suggest that for fundraisers there are three levels of analysis — three forms of perspective — about what’s going on with donors. Here are my terms for them: 1. Ignorespective 2. Retrospective 3. Introspective Now, ‘Ignorespective’ (pronounced IGno-respective) really means no analysis or perspective at all. Just keep on doing. Pedal to the […]

Learn More February 5, 2015

Fixing The Donor Experience

I just noticed this — not unfamiliar — fundraiser’s lament from the trenches: “Our donors don’t appreciate us!” Phil McCorkle, writing a column in the Salem, Oregon Statesman Journal directed at any and all donors who might be reading (i.e., not specifically the donors to his own nonprofit), says: “Over the course of 28 years […]

Learn More February 4, 2015

Shut The Barn Door!

Last week Tom appropriately boiled the pot with his posts Acquisition Addiction and Hold the Line. The Agitator’s Comments section bubbled. Tom ended his last post with this sage advice: “Any acquisition strategy should begin with a retention improvement strategy.” Amen. Rinse and Repeat: “Any acquisition strategy should begin with a retention improvement strategy.” The […]

Learn More February 2, 2015

“Hold The Line!”

My recent post — Acquisition Addiction — has caused a bit of reader consternation that The Agitator might view the ‘acquisition’ and ‘retention’ sides of fundraising as an ‘either/or’ proposition. I don’t want to leave that impression. Of course nonprofits need to prospect for new donors. However, what I am interested in (and I know […]

Learn More January 30, 2015

Call Them ‘Donors’ … Not ‘Users’

There’s a movement afoot in the tech world to put ‘people’ first — before content, before design, and before software. Hopefully the same thing will catch on in the nonprofit world and ‘donors’ will rule. For example, Facebook recently announced they have begun referring to ‘people’ as people, not users. And before Facebook weighed in, […]

Learn More January 29, 2015

The Risk Not Taken

At the start of the year Steve MacLaughlin, Blackbaud’s Director of Analytics, in his post 5 Things That Won’t Happen in 2015 hit on what I consider the biggest risk facing nonprofits these days — doing nothing. Sure, not so long ago maintaining the status quo — repeating the same activities year after year — […]

Learn More January 28, 2015

Acquisition Addiction

Acquisition addiction is to fundraisers what steroids are to professional cyclists. Its contagious nature stems from the perception that since every one else is doing/using, I’m at a competitive disadvantage if I don’t. Peer pressure at its worst. I’ve just read Are You Addicted to Acquisition?, written by Ece Ünver, on the Fundraising 101 blog. […]

Learn More January 27, 2015

Losing Trust … Building Trust

Global PR giant Edelman has released its 2015 Trust Barometer, which shows “evaporating” trust — worldwide — for media, business, nonprofits and many governments (the institution with already the lowest trust levels). Most Agitator readers will probably first want to know where trust levels stand in your country (27 were studied), and how nonprofits stack […]

Learn More January 23, 2015

<< 1 … 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 … 86 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!