• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

Losing Trust … Building Trust

Global PR giant Edelman has released its 2015 Trust Barometer, which shows “evaporating” trust — worldwide — for media, business, nonprofits and many governments (the institution with already the lowest trust levels). Most Agitator readers will probably first want to know where trust levels stand in your country (27 were studied), and how nonprofits stack […]

Learn More January 23, 2015

Being Unforgettable

I’m teasing out the first month of the year for all it’s worth in terms of recommendations for my 2015 ‘To do’ list. Frankly, I’m doing a lot of stealing from the advice I see others giving, massaged against what I deem most important to fundraising success. Here’s an example: Recommendation #4 on my 2015 […]

Learn More January 16, 2015

Top Of Roger’s 2015 ‘To Do’ List

On Friday Tom announced that high on his recommended 2015 ‘To Do’ List for fundraisers is getting up to speed with online video storytelling. I’m putting the somewhat less glitzy but fundamentally essential task of continuing education, reading and learning on top of mine. Frankly, anyone with the goal of becoming an expert fundraiser or […]

Learn More January 11, 2015

Didn’t You Hear Me? No “Thank You”!

Few posts over the years have provoked as much outrage and discussion as Tom’s No “Thank You”!  Hopefully, you’re now back at your desk, treating as your highest priority the privilege of thanking your year-end donors. If so, you’ll want to read this — especially the Comments. Then go ahead, this is your chance set Tom […]

Learn More January 5, 2015

Promising The Boss

Now that this year’s just about over, and you’re thinking about the bottom line promises you’ll have to make to keep ‘The Boss’ happy for 2015, here’s a Belford gem from The Agitator archives. It’s titled, You Promised More Cash. I know you’ve been there … and I can feel your pain. Roger  

Learn More December 29, 2014

It Took Roger 40 Years!

Forty years for him … a few hours for you. It took Roger forty years, but he finally completed his first book last August, Retention Fundraising: The New Art and Science of Keeping Your Donors for Life. Have you read it yet? What better time than over this holiday season? Because you know you should […]

Learn More December 22, 2014

Make Your Donors Feel Appreciated

Editors’ Note: The following is an excerpt from Chapter 18 of Roger’s Retention Fundraising: the new art and science of keeping your donors for life. Available here in paper or e-book versions. What better time than the end of this year and the start of a new year to review — and improve — how […]

Learn More December 15, 2014

It’s So Easy To Just Blast Them Out

‘Tis the height of email fundraising season, as we noted yesterday. And judging from the email I see, most fundraisers are just blasting away, with no apparent effort to use donor information (of course, that assumes you have some!) to target donors with personally relevant messages. “Too damn busy this time of year” I can […]

Learn More December 11, 2014

Better Than ‘Fundraising’

In the course of our recent webinar on “How to Stop Donor Churn Before It Starts” , Kevin Schulman made the statement that “good donor service is a far better way of bringing in money than what most of the direct response world calls ‘fundraising‘. A lot better.” No doubt a lot of webinar participants […]

Learn More December 8, 2014

It’s Giving Friday … Now What?

It’s ‘Giving Friday’ today. Giving Tuesday 2014 is over and judged a raging success. Tuesday’s ‘take’ has been counted: $46 million, up from $28 million last year, according to a first estimate from the Chronicle of Philanthropy. What do we do next? I suggest your #1 priority should be getting a second gift from your […]

Learn More December 5, 2014

<< 1 … 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 … 87 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!