• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

We Don’t Have A Donor Retention Problem!

Confess … did you ever think you’d see a headline like that on an Agitator post?! Don’t hyperventilate now, because in fact Roger and I haven’t reversed course, and don’t intend to. But that said, a couple of recent — somewhat contrarian — posts from Analytical Ones caught my attention. In We don’t have a […]

Learn More October 21, 2014

Size Doesn’t Matter

Yesterday I chided Agitator readers a bit on the retention issue, suggesting nonprofits were showing too little interest in their fleeing donors. I was rewarded (and so, I suspect, were Bloomerang and Pamela Grow!!) by the Comment from Ann Kensek at The Counseling Service of of Addison County in Vermont (CSAC-VT). Clearly, CSAC-VT is not […]

Learn More October 14, 2014

Cassandra, Chicken Little and Pollyanna

Cassandra says the end is here, can’t you see?! Chicken Little says the sky is falling … it just hit us on the head. Pollyanna says hogwash, everything is fine and will only get better. Most fundraisers appear to be Pollyanna’s. I’m inferring that from the pattern I see in Agitator reader comments to the […]

Learn More October 13, 2014

282 Years Of Annual Giving

Few acts in life are more memorable than tossing a coin into the Trevi Fountain in Rome. I don’t know whether it’s the romance the act promises — the mythical assurance that your coin toss guarantees you a return to Rome — or just the spraying beauty of all that wet Travertine marble chiseled in […]

Learn More October 10, 2014

Donor Sapiens … Extinct Or A Myth?

I just read some great fundraising observations by Francesco Ambrogetti, writing in 101Fundraising. He talks about the extinction of ‘donor sapiens’. Francesco notes that most fundraisers, when they first contemplate what it might take to attract a new donor, seem properly aware that they need to appeal to the emotions. He observes that at that […]

Learn More October 9, 2014

Wanted: Retention Superstars

Agitator readers know well how incessantly Roger and I beat the donor retention drum. Heck, Roger’s even written a book on the subject, Retention Fundraising. But sometimes, when you think you’ve said it all, someone comes along and makes an observation that shocks you to attention, forcing you to admit … “I never looked at […]

Learn More October 7, 2014

[FNAME] Never Works

Axciom is certainly one of the top bananas when it comes to database marketing. These folks breathe data. So I was struck by a short post by David Baker, Axciom’s VP of Digital Product Solutions, in which he actually warns against going overboard with respect to personalizing marketing messages. Here — in [FNAME] Never Works […]

Learn More September 23, 2014

Making The Most Of The Hottest Season

With only 98 days to go before Christmas — the height of the year-end giving season — here’s some advice for making the most of the year-end giving season … AND carrying it into the future. Perhaps you’ve ignored our Christmas in August advice, or even better you’ve adopted some of it. If you want […]

Learn More September 18, 2014

New Automated Fundraising Tool. Free. Forever.

Today were adding a valuable, new tool to The Agitator Toolbox. The Donor Commitment Feedback Widget for Nonprofits has been designed, tested and proven by the folks at our sister company DonorVoice and is being given to Agitator readers for: $30/month                                                                                                   $0 (Free). That’s right. FREE. And how long will this price last? Forever. Hard […]

Learn More September 16, 2014

Needed: An Incentive To Fight For The Future

The past two days, Roger has written about thank you’s and their importance to retaining donors. See here and here. Increasing the lifetime value of a donor file by increasing retention rates seems like a ‘no brainer’ when it comes to improving an organization’s fundraising performance. But someone needs to identify and set that specific […]

Learn More September 10, 2014

<< 1 … 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 … 87 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!