• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Don’t Treat Them Like They’re Dead!

One of The Agitator’s favorite fundraisers, Mark Phillips at London’s Bluefrog, just posted a gem of an article, as usual. [My apologies to our UK readership for boring you; I assume (hope) all of you read Mark’s Queer Ideas blog religiously.] Mark’s article is about how to handle ‘in-memoriam’ gifts … specifically, how to follow […]

Learn More July 11, 2014

More Fireworks Please

[Editors’ Note: Eight years ago, to honor Independence Day in the United States we wrote the following on the importance of change and innovation. Seems to us it’s still, sadly, quite on point. We’re surely not seeing enough fireworks for change. Roger and Tom] As We The People celebrate America’s 230th Independence Day amid fireworks, […]

Learn More July 4, 2014

Fired, With Enthusiasm

Or should it be “Fired with enthusiasm”? There’s a big difference as UK fundraiser Ken Burnett sees it. Awhile back, as part of a series Proud to be a fundraiser, Ken wrote Keeping the right fundraisers. He wrote of fundraisers as either “radiators” or “drains” … The radiators, who spread heat and passion, radiating the […]

Learn More June 9, 2014

Top Fundraising Fallacies

Building on Drayton Bird’s blog, Five shocking lessons from a lifetime in marketing, Jeff Brooks added some fundraising spin of his own with 5 things you wish you already knew. Jeff inspired me to think more specifically about basic marketing mistakes fundraisers make. Here is my first pass at a list of ‘Top Fundraising Fallacies’ […]

Learn More May 15, 2014

Are You Trusting That Trust Will Just ‘Happen’?

Commercial marketers are as concerned as nonprofits, probably even more so, about customer loyalty. And building the trust that serves as the foundation or prerequisite of loyalty. This article by Stephanie Miller of the Direct Marketing Association, Investing in Trust to Gain Loyalty, gives some insight into the commercial direct marketer’s thinking about loyalty and […]

Learn More May 8, 2014

Dear Bernard …

Or is it Dennis? Or is it ‘whoever you are’? Or is it good-bye?! The answer is … good-bye. Fundraising Success just published an item by Dennis Fischman, originally posted on #fundchat. It’s brief and to the point. An important point, so I’m reprinting in its entirety. The Quickest Way To Lose A Donor “Dear […]

Learn More May 7, 2014

Thank You, Thank You, Thank You

I was planning on writing a post riffing off this great NY Times article — The Found Art of Thank-You Notes — in a hopeful attempt to turn you on to the joy of expressing appreciation. Even if, as a fundraiser mindful of your brand perception, you can’t express yourself on “weighty ecru Connor correspondence […]

Learn More April 22, 2014

Thinking ‘Lifetime’

Yesterday I talked about the simplest step your organization can take to increase the lifetime value of your donors — tighten up your acknowledgement process. If you didn’t check out this compelling data from Grizzard establishing that point, please do so. But then I got to thinking, how many Agitators readers might still not be […]

Learn More April 15, 2014

Make This Improvement Your #1 Fundraising Priority

Debbi Barber at Grizzard, in a post last week titled One Simple Way to Improve Retention, hit the nail on the head. She recommended one improvement that would unfailingly yield higher lifetime value from any nonprofit’s donors. And it ain’t brain surgery, although it could well require a change to your fundraising mindset and priorities. […]

Learn More April 14, 2014

Loyalty Inflection Points

Is organizational loyalty infectious? Possibly. For example, after momentous achievements that inspire group celebration and pride in belonging. But I’m not talking in this post about ‘infectious’ … the word in the title is ‘inflection’. So, first, a definition from a fascinating white paper, Inflection Points: Seizing the Moments in Customer Loyalty, authored by loyalty […]

Learn More April 8, 2014

<< 1 … 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 … 87 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!