• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Thank You For Real Data On Thank You’s

Hallelujah! Actual test data on the efficacy of thank you’s. In case you’ve haven’t noticed, here’s is a bit of testing information just posted on The Agitator website by Angel Aloma at Food For The Poor … “Thank you letters have been very effective fundraisers for our organization. On average, we get more than one […]

Learn More May 2, 2012

Why Donors Tune You Out

Mark Phillips at Bluefrog has written an excellent post called Why donors don’t want to hear from you. I heartily commend it to you. He cites survey data that shows donors are quite sensitive to charities using inaccurate personal data in their communications. For example: 20% of respondents would stop giving to charities that used […]

Learn More April 30, 2012

OK, “Thank You!”

I’d like to say “Thank you” to all the readers who commented on my controversial No “Thank You” post of last week. I do so noting there’s no empirical evidence that thanking you will make you more likely to comment again! For suggesting that maybe “Thank you’s” to donors don’t matter, some of you concluded […]

Learn More April 24, 2012

No “Thank You”!

We have met the Wizard of Oz, and not only is he just another poor slob, he wears no clothes! Here is a ‘must read’ blog post by Chuck English at Marketing That Works … regarding Thank You’s. Chuck started out by posing what I know he expected would be a question with a very […]

Learn More April 19, 2012

Looking For Retention In All The Wrong Places

Tom’s  post yesterday, Nonprofits and the Customer Experience not only warrants reading a second time, but I also feel compelled to pile on some more emphasis and detail because it goes right to the heart of retention and donor value. Tom writes: “In the commercial marketing arena, there’s heaps of chat about the ‘customer experience’ […]

Learn More April 13, 2012

Nonprofits And The Customer Experience

In the commercial marketing arena, there’s heaps of chat about the ‘customer experience’ and how to improve it in the interest of retaining and up-selling customers. Nonprofit marketers who watch that space are probably a bit dismissive, because few of us have stores, physical products, services, complex transactional websites, call centers and so forth where […]

Learn More April 12, 2012

Business Fails At Customer Retention Too

The Agitator is rather passionate on the subject of donor retention. [Just ‘Search’ that term on our website!] So we were gratified to see this article — Keep ’em Comin’ Back — from the Center for Media Research discussing an Acxiom/Loyalty 360 study of customer retention in the commercial space. If it’s any consolation, businesses […]

Learn More April 10, 2012

Keeping Your Promise

Roger’s ‘leaky bucket’ post yesterday was about donor retention. This admonition in particular struck me: Recognize acquisition for what it is – lead generation. Increasingly, for many — too many — nonprofits and donors, that first gift is the last gift! I use the word ‘gift’ purposefully. Because that’s all the donor has really done […]

Learn More March 29, 2012

Flat Earth Fundraising: Ignoring The Leaky Bucket

Consider this…. …the average nonprofit has a 60 to 70% chance of  getting an addition contributions from existing donors; …a 20 to 40% probability of getting a gift from a lapsed donor; …but less than a 2% chance of receiving a gift from a prospect. YET… day in day out thousands of nonprofits pour the […]

Learn More March 28, 2012

The Perfect Thank You

If I might please interrupt your reading of “What to learn from the Kony video” articles for a few moments … For a fundraising lesson. Here, from Charity:Water, is a terrific example of the way ‘Thank You” needs to be expressed to your donors. Click the screen shot (or here) to view the video and […]

Learn More March 19, 2012

<< 1 … 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 … 87 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!