• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

Sorry, Hard Work Required

As The Agitator bangs away on improving donor retention, we’re mindful that success requires a key ingredient … hard work. We all know how to chuck out (more kindly, ‘dis-invest’ in) our most marginal donors, and we know how (or at least we have a plan) to cultivate those with demonstrated high value. The more […]

Learn More September 1, 2011

Do Your Donors Want To Relate?

The truth is … many do, some don’t. And of course the trick to optimizing your fundraising is knowing who does and who doesn’t. While The Agitator preaches retention, retention, retention — i.e., building durable relationships — we also note that you shouldn’t (and can’t afford to) simply throw money against all your existing donors […]

Learn More August 31, 2011

Reactivating ‘Inactives’

It’s fascinating to watch how commercial marketers deal with the same problems nonprofit marketers face. Here’s a post from Email Insider dealing with what to do about inactive, or non-responding, email subscribers. The author makes four points: 1. No matter how your company defines inactives, the problem typically is huge. He says commercial marketers typically […]

Learn More August 24, 2011

Are We Completely Wrong?

Donor-Central asks: Are we completely wrong? Posing the possibility that donors don’t want more of a relationship with their charities … in fact, they want less. And if that’s right, says Donor-Central, then the traditional direct response model — acquire as cheaply as possible and then cultivate like hell — is breaking down. They cite […]

Learn More August 10, 2011

More Than A Fundraising Dating Service

With her usual style, grace and sense of humor Margaret Battistelli Gardner, the Editor-in-Chief of Fundraising Success helpfully added to the growing chorus of concern over donor commitment and donor relationship management. Margaret correctly notes “That lazy, ineffectual approach of talking at donors is so over that we need a new word for how over […]

Learn More August 5, 2011

The Long Term Test

Earlier this week Reinier Spruit (at Greenpeace International) posted at 101Fundraising regarding what he calls “long term testing”. He urged fundraisers to consider stretching their testing horizons beyond the ‘quick and dirty’ typical package tests — carriers, teasers, reply devices, etc — to comprehensive testing of entire donor communications streams … his specific target was […]

Learn More July 22, 2011

The Fundraising Effectiveness Report

I am totally embarrassed to admit that I’ve just taken my first look at the 2010 Fundraising Effectiveness Report produced by the Association of Fundraising Professionals. The Report is based on 1,982 responses from US nonprofits who collectively raised $1.5 billion in 2008-9. What the Report provides is a focus on net gain (or loss) […]

Learn More July 19, 2011

Fundraising & The Value Of Email Addresses

We’re back on the Retention Trail today. Rick Christ, a VP at Amergent, has just issued Donor Stewardship:  Making Virtual Friends for Life, a white paper that you should download and read today. When it comes to retention, Rick doesn’t mince words, always writes well, and succinctly summarizes the Amergent analysis of millions of gifts. […]

Learn More July 13, 2011

Do I Have Your Attention?

In a recent post, marketing maven Seth Godin makes this observation: “Attention is a bit like real estate, in that they’re not making any more of it. Unlike real estate, though, it keeps going up in value.” Of course he’s not the only commentator to stress the point that ‘attention’ is the scarcest and most […]

Learn More July 6, 2011

A Multi-Channel Renewal Strategy

Direct Marketing IQ has just published an excellent fundraising guide, titled The Art & Science of Multi-Channel Fundraising. Nine chapters plus eight case studies on how to pull together direct mail, online, social media, mobile, telemarketing and more for high impact fundraising campaigns. Roger’s written one of the chapters. And just to show that his […]

Learn More July 1, 2011

<< 1 … 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 … 86 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!