• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

More Donors Down The Drain

In what it spun as good news, the Association of Fundraising Professionals, in the latest report of its Fundraising Effectiveness Project, has released findings indicating that nonprofits lost fewer donors in 2010 than in 2009. Yeah, I guess that’s good news. But here’s the bottomline, as AFP reports it: For every $5.35 that organizations gained […]

Learn More September 2, 2011

Sorry, Hard Work Required

As The Agitator bangs away on improving donor retention, we’re mindful that success requires a key ingredient … hard work. We all know how to chuck out (more kindly, ‘dis-invest’ in) our most marginal donors, and we know how (or at least we have a plan) to cultivate those with demonstrated high value. The more […]

Learn More September 1, 2011

Do Your Donors Want To Relate?

The truth is … many do, some don’t. And of course the trick to optimizing your fundraising is knowing who does and who doesn’t. While The Agitator preaches retention, retention, retention — i.e., building durable relationships — we also note that you shouldn’t (and can’t afford to) simply throw money against all your existing donors […]

Learn More August 31, 2011

Reactivating ‘Inactives’

It’s fascinating to watch how commercial marketers deal with the same problems nonprofit marketers face. Here’s a post from Email Insider dealing with what to do about inactive, or non-responding, email subscribers. The author makes four points: 1. No matter how your company defines inactives, the problem typically is huge. He says commercial marketers typically […]

Learn More August 24, 2011

Are We Completely Wrong?

Donor-Central asks: Are we completely wrong? Posing the possibility that donors don’t want more of a relationship with their charities … in fact, they want less. And if that’s right, says Donor-Central, then the traditional direct response model — acquire as cheaply as possible and then cultivate like hell — is breaking down. They cite […]

Learn More August 10, 2011

More Than A Fundraising Dating Service

With her usual style, grace and sense of humor Margaret Battistelli Gardner, the Editor-in-Chief of Fundraising Success helpfully added to the growing chorus of concern over donor commitment and donor relationship management. Margaret correctly notes “That lazy, ineffectual approach of talking at donors is so over that we need a new word for how over […]

Learn More August 5, 2011

The Long Term Test

Earlier this week Reinier Spruit (at Greenpeace International) posted at 101Fundraising regarding what he calls “long term testing”. He urged fundraisers to consider stretching their testing horizons beyond the ‘quick and dirty’ typical package tests — carriers, teasers, reply devices, etc — to comprehensive testing of entire donor communications streams … his specific target was […]

Learn More July 22, 2011

The Fundraising Effectiveness Report

I am totally embarrassed to admit that I’ve just taken my first look at the 2010 Fundraising Effectiveness Report produced by the Association of Fundraising Professionals. The Report is based on 1,982 responses from US nonprofits who collectively raised $1.5 billion in 2008-9. What the Report provides is a focus on net gain (or loss) […]

Learn More July 19, 2011

Fundraising & The Value Of Email Addresses

We’re back on the Retention Trail today. Rick Christ, a VP at Amergent, has just issued Donor Stewardship:  Making Virtual Friends for Life, a white paper that you should download and read today. When it comes to retention, Rick doesn’t mince words, always writes well, and succinctly summarizes the Amergent analysis of millions of gifts. […]

Learn More July 13, 2011

Do I Have Your Attention?

In a recent post, marketing maven Seth Godin makes this observation: “Attention is a bit like real estate, in that they’re not making any more of it. Unlike real estate, though, it keeps going up in value.” Of course he’s not the only commentator to stress the point that ‘attention’ is the scarcest and most […]

Learn More July 6, 2011

<< 1 … 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 … 87 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!