• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Older And Crankier

As you could tell from his article yesterday, Roger’s getting a bit older and crankier. So he’s inspired today’s post from his much younger colleague, which is all about how marketers should communicate — or not communicate — with and about older people. And as we all know, most nonprofit donations come from older people. […]

Learn More June 30, 2011

What Are You & Your Consultants Afraid Of

Monday and Tuesday we invited Agitator readers to sign up for a free survey and project on donor retention. An inquisitive but tiny handful of pioneers have done so. Folks who care enough about the future of fundraising to jump in. Here’s the list after two days. Hooraay!!! The Humane Society of the United States […]

Learn More June 29, 2011

Today You Get The Benefit Of The Doubt

In yesterday’s post, we offered Agitator readers the opportunity to participate, at our expense, in a project we’ve designed to crack the nut on donor retention … to ‘prove out’ a strategy for curbing donor defection. Roger and I think this is hugely important. Because from previous reader surveys and the hard data trend reports […]

Learn More June 28, 2011

Testing Fundraising’s Urban Myth?

WANTED! Curious, concerned, innovative volunteers to participate in discovering the vaccine for Defecting Donor Syndrome We’re about to undertake an applied research project aimed at helping nonprofits increase the retention and Life Time Value of their donors and members. We’re looking for four or five pioneering volunteers to participate with us.  At our cost and […]

Learn More June 27, 2011

We’re Not The Only Ones Focused On Retention

Back in April, we asked Agitator readers a simple question: What percentage of your nonprofit’s 1st time donors make a second gift? The final results of our survey … 32% — less than 30 percent converted 29% — 30-39 percent converted 22% — 40-49 percent converted 17% — 50 percent or more converted Not impressive. […]

Learn More June 24, 2011

Belt Tightening Continues

While you’re contemplating yesterday’s Agitator post about who provides the most useful “macro” data about charitable giving trends, contemplate this snapshot of consumer spending intentions. According to the American Pulse Survey, conducted twice monthly across a representative panel of 5,000 Americans, 90% do not expect a pay increase in the coming year. And here’s how […]

Learn More June 23, 2011

How NOT To Treat A Donor!

If a donor says — “Do not telemarket to me! — put them on a suppression list. If a donor says — “Do not rent my name!” — don’t rent their name. If a donor says — “Remove me from your email list — remove them. Above all, don’t ignore them! Don’t treat them the […]

Learn More June 20, 2011

Telemarketers Rally

Like tennis pros coming back from two sets down, telemarketers have rallied back from yesterday’s Are You Embarrassed post to score big time! Some comments … “Yes, some board members don’t like the phones (so don’t call them!) but they should like basic math.” “TM helps our clients raise more money, renew/reinstate more donors, increase […]

Learn More June 17, 2011

‘Thonors’, Not Donors

The Wall Street Journal’s SmartMoney has recently focused on the popularity — and economics — of sporting events, walkathons (and other ‘thons’) and similar individual-sponsor fundraising events. Are Charity Walks and Races Worth the Effort? asks Anne Kadet writing in SmartMoney in a superb and balanced ‘must read’ article for anyone in the event fundraising […]

Learn More June 15, 2011

Different Shapes And Sizes

When I read the comments Agitator readers make on our posts, I realize the huge diversity of our readership. I just finished ‘moderating’ two recent comments that indicate the huge spread in reader interest and focus. Both are brief, so I’ll re-publish here to underscore a point. Comment #1 from Kristen Smith at People For […]

Learn More June 14, 2011

<< 1 … 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 … 86 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!