• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

Astounding Donor Loyalty

In response to our Lazy or Careless Fundraising? article last week, Gail Meltzer of CoreStrategies for Nonprofits sent us an article she wrote describing her own experience as a lifelong under-cultivated donor. Her article, Acknowledging Cumulative Giving, was published last November/December in Advancing Philanthropy, the pub of the Association of Fundraising Professionals (available online to […]

Learn More February 7, 2011

Lazy Or Careless Fundraising?

Here’s an email The Agitator received yesterday … Good morning Agitator! I had two very disappointing donor experiences occur yesterday, and I just wanted to share. Mainly because BOTH could have been avoided if somebody had bothered to take a look at their own data correctly. The first experience was recounted to me by a […]

Learn More February 4, 2011

How Does It Make You Feel?

Have you ever asked this rather crucial question of your nonprofit’s donors: “How does supporting [your organization] make you feel?” ActionAid in the UK is doing just that … in this creative way. Check out their ‘Happy Bubble’ campaign. Do your donors feel something about your organization? Or do you just take that for granted? […]

Learn More January 25, 2011

Do Your Donors Trust You?

SOFII, a terrific resource for fundraisers, recently published an analysis of the following letter sent to Oxfam Ireland by one of its donors. The analysis was written by Damian O’Broin, director of Ask Direct, a fundraising and direct marketing agency in Dublin. Please find enclosed a cheque… to pay for raffle tickets… Oxfam is my […]

Learn More January 13, 2011

Rise Of The Sheconomy

Time magazine recently ran this interesting feature, The Rise of the Sheconomy. It’s about the growing clout of women in the marketplace. Women control more wealth, and more spending decisions, than ever before. Maybe that extends to giving to nonprofits. I say “maybe” because I’m not sure what the most recent giving data says. Our […]

Learn More December 14, 2010

They Never Even Ask!

Last week I urged you to read Network for Good’s excellent study on online giving. In case you haven’t, here’s a passage that might interest you. Noting that those who give to charities’ own websites give more over time than donors who give via ‘portal’ or social networking sites, the study observes: “Charities don’t always […]

Learn More December 13, 2010

Investing In Fundraising

Awhile back I cited Ken Burnett’s article, 7 Things for Fundraisers to Do Now. Today I want to focus on his recommendation #4: Fundraisers make too many false economies because they have failed to adequately present the commercial case for investment in donor development. A hundred dollars invested wisely makes much more sense to donors […]

Learn More December 6, 2010

Down With “Donors”!

Our DonorTrends colleague Kevin Schulman got a hair up his nose this week on the very concept of “donors.” You might recall that a few days ago we noted Blackbaud’s report that a key global trend in fundraising was a shift from a “transactional” approach to “relationship management” approach. Kevin has some strong views on […]

Learn More November 12, 2010

Email And Donor Relationships

We all know email as the workhorse of online fundraising. But what about email as a relationship and loyalty building tool? Writing in Email Insider, Loren McDonald at Silverpop, an online marketing agency, offers some interesting examples of commercial email approaches that are not aimed directly at sales, although in some examples that objective clearly […]

Learn More October 8, 2010

Nature Or Nurture?

Kristin McCurry of MINDset Direct is one of our favorite co-conspirators. As today’s Guest Agitator, she poses a question all fundraisers have asked in their darkest moments … Does it really matter what we do as fundraisers?! Or is “good donor behavior” simply built into some individuals who we are lucky enough to initially attract […]

Learn More October 4, 2010

<< 1 … 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 … 87 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!