• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

Fundraising Flat Says Target Analytics

Target Analytics has just released its Index of National Fundraising Performance for the 12 months of activity through the 2nd Quarter of 2010. With essentially flat revenue and donor growth from the first half of 2009 through the first half of 2010, there are still some rays of sunshine in an otherwise pretty dreary fundraising […]

Learn More September 29, 2010

Nature Conservancy Runs Gauntlet

Regular Agitator readers know about The Agitator Gauntlet — our challenge for fundraisers to present their appeals for the scrutiny of other Agitator readers. The Nature Conservancy has bravely stepped forward to submit two online appeals they have made attempting to recruit current donors into their monthly giving program. In submitting their appeals, Sue Citro […]

Learn More September 27, 2010

Taking Donor Loyalty Seriously

Earlier this month we noted a blog post by marketer Seth Godin on loyalty. Here’s some customer and donor loyalty experience from Agitator reader Andrew Kramer that I didn’t want to see under-appreciated in Comment limbo … “I recently switched electricity providers from an all wind provider with a great brand (one that made me […]

Learn More September 21, 2010

Going For The Gold

No question about it:  “Thank You” are the two most important – and probably the most ignored – words in fundraising. Over the years, like some well-meaning mother imploring her 9 year-old to “write that thank-you note to Aunt Grace” The Agitator has probably been a bit too in loco parentis on the subject.  But […]

Learn More September 15, 2010

Heart Of The Donor

Fundraising giant Russ Reid has released an impressive bit of survey research on donor behavior and attitudes. Their findings square up exactly against our own DonorTrends research in many areas … The strong correlation between religion and giving (i.e., where religion appears more important in individual’s life, there’s a greater propensity to give, and to […]

Learn More September 10, 2010

Seth Godin On Loyalty

Some good observations from the marketing guru on loyalty. First, an interesting definition:”Loyalty is what we call it when someone refuses a momentarily better option.” Not too sentimental … at first glance. Then some bad news: “Loyalty isn’t forever. Sometimes, the world changes significantly and even though the loyal partner/customer likes that label, it gets […]

Learn More September 9, 2010

“Warm & Fuzzy” Matters

I thought you might be interested in two new studies of corporate brand reputation. Harris Interactive just released its list of top corporate brand reputations for 2009. [They first ask consumers an open-ended question re companies they’ve heard about and think stand out as having “best” reputations. After compiling all those “nominations” they then ask […]

Learn More September 8, 2010

Say “Thank You”

Fundraiser Ken Burnett says that any fundraiser who doesn’t say “Thank you” to donors is — he doesn’t mince words — a fool. In a recent blog post, Ken is responding to a donor who suggests otherwise. Says Ken: “…as a profession we are truly crap at saying thank you and welcome properly and at […]

Learn More September 1, 2010

Marketing Mania

I follow the articles of Kendall Allen, a marketing and digital media consultant who writes occasionally in Online Spin. In her latest article, she comments on some issues that drive commercial marketers nuts, and probably a lot of nonprofit marketers and fundraisers as well. She says: “…there are at least four areas that may drive […]

Learn More August 31, 2010

Single Channel Is Dead

Boy, did Steve MacLaughlin at Target Analytics make today’s post easy! Here’s the lead from his recent blog post: “Direct mail is dead. Email is dead. TV and radio are dead. Face to face is dead. Telegraph is dead. Social media is dead. There are so many obituaries being written these days that it’s hard […]

Learn More August 12, 2010

<< 1 … 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 … 87 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!