• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Copywriting / creative

Direct mail: How To Beat The Control

Donor acquisition is entering its 6th year of a prolonged and steady slump for most organizations. And probably another year of playing the blame game —“poor lists”, “weak economy”, “increased competition” — won’t make things better. Neither will ordering your copywriters, no matter how talented, to “beat the control” be of any help. After 40+ […]

Learn More February 1, 2012

Flat Earth Fundraising: Moneyball

I have a suggestion for the conference planners at AFP, DMA, CASE and every other association in our nonprofit galaxy:  Scrap two hours, 13 minutes of “seen this, heard that” sessions, serve free popcorn, and treat your registrants to a screening of Moneyball. I’m serious.  Here’s why. Moneyball, the 2003 iconoclastic bestseller by Michael Lewis  […]

Learn More January 30, 2012

Real Fundraisers Don’t Whine, Worry or Wait

That’s why today we’re launching a new feature: The Agitator Toolbox of Innovation. There’s simply too much good stuff going on out there to spend time dithering about whether or when the economy will rebound, for boards to come to their senses … or whatever folks spend their time worrying about. Usually, things over which […]

Learn More January 19, 2012

2012 Year End Giving Begins Now!

That’s the headline that attracted me to blogger Mark Marshall’s latest post. I expected Mark to be making a point about building relationships. Your year-end giving isn’t simply a response to some clever tactics dreamed up in October and executed from mid-November on. Those tactics are simply tapping into a (hopefully deep) reservoir of donor […]

Learn More January 4, 2012

Through The Rearview Mirror Of 2011

As Christmas approaches Tom can’t find his Grinch costume. Roger’s out of coal. So we did the next best thing: made our list, checked it twice, and found out which posts were ‘naughty’ and which were ‘nice. The Agitator’s esteemed Department of Analytics carefully measured which 2011 posts received the most readership, which garnered the […]

Learn More December 21, 2011

Flat Earth Fundraising — Wanted: A Roll Of Human Duct Tape

The term ‘multi-channel integration’ has garnered more ink, conference bookings and webinar time this year than any other concept in our trade. But … the more attention it gets, the more I keep wondering: If so many are touting the glory of this new fundraising heaven, why are so few organizations actually making it through […]

Learn More December 13, 2011

Flat Earth Fundraising: Ice Cream Murder And Donor Loyalty

Looking for a shorthand way to understand how you can improve donor lifetime value by 130%? Then take a look at the infographic  below – The Anatomy of a Committed Donor – prepared by our colleague Kevin Schulman over at DonorVoice. Kevin’s infographic (click image to enlarge) distills the essence of the landmark National Donor […]

Learn More December 5, 2011

Join UK Donor Commitment Study

Here is a reminder … Our colleagues at DonorVoice are going to replicate in the UK their recent US study of donor commitment. The call is out for UK charities who would like to participate in the study, which will be conducted in association with Ken Burnett and SOFII. Here is what Ken said about […]

Learn More November 30, 2011

Flat Earth Fundraising: Asking Amounts

I’m truly not old enough to remember when physicians abandoned the use of leeches. But, I am old enough to recall the origins of asking amounts. The year was 1970. Computers – big mainframes, not PC’s and The Cloud – had just begun to edge out the heavy, old metal Addressograph plates and the traditional […]

Learn More November 14, 2011

The Future Of Fundraising

Send this to your CEO and every member of your board. Right now! Frankly, I’m exhausted from preparing this, but I really hope you’ll invest the  time to read the whole post. Believe me, it’s worth it if you care about the future of your organization. Here’s why. Blackbaud has just delivered a “must read” […]

Learn More November 4, 2011

<< 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 … 20 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!