• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Demographics

Don’t Blame The Boomers … It’s Our Fault

Lately, when I’ve written about fundraising and Boomers, Kn Moy, the ‘innovation strategy’ guy at Masterworks has responded with excellent commentary and data (as he did here back in January). Kn thinks heaps about ‘generational fundraising’ for his agency. Here are his excellent comments on my post of yesterday, Boomers: Boom Or Bust?, expressing my […]

Learn More March 21, 2013

Today’s The Day: Focus On Retention

This morning at 11:00 a.m. Eastern we’ll host the Agitator/DonorVoice Webinar on Retention. We now have 821 folks registered, a healthy sign of the concern over retention among Agitator readers. There’s still some room if you’d like to join us. But even if you can’t attend today you may want to register here so we […]

Learn More March 19, 2013

Do You Close The Bathroom Door Even When You’re The Only Person Home?

With that question, as part of a personality quiz to prospective readers of the magazine Psychology Today, the late, great copywriter Bill Jayme dramatically increased the circulation of that magazine. The right question — those that get to the heart of consumer and donor attitudes — are not only key to acquisition, they’re even more […]

Learn More March 12, 2013

Better Donor Communications, Or Creative Destruction?

Jeff Brooks at Future Fundraising Now just ran this guest post — Why donors get jaded, and how you can stop it — from George Crankovic at TrueSense Marketing. George says too many nonprofits give the appearance of having an “insatiable appetite for money” and “will do anything to keep raising more and more of […]

Learn More March 8, 2013

Boost Retention and Lifetime Value Big Time

Committed or loyal donors are made, not born. And since Tom and I have been banging away on the subject of retention, we thought it high time to offer up some specific, empirically proven practices and techniques for improvement. ‘Retention’ and ‘Lifetime Value’ are the fundamental vital signs for virtually every organization that relies on […]

Learn More March 5, 2013

Why Donors Drop Out

Carefully study Bloomerang’s “Donor Loyalty” chart below. With the exception of ‘death and ‘poverty’, nonprofits by their own actions — or lack of them — control whether a donor stays or goes. That’s right, 53% of the reasons donors give for heading to the exit is because the organization failed to properly communicate in one […]

Learn More February 27, 2013

Is Your Nonprofit Going The Way Of The GOP?

The liberal cable news pundits are having a field day chronicling the ‘demise’ of the Republican Party as a major factor in the future of national politics in the U.S. They reason, citing poll after poll, that soon the Grand Old Party will be relegated to the dustbin of history — a minority coalition of […]

Learn More February 25, 2013

Acquisition: Premiums, Crack Cocaine And Nonprofit Suicide

Almost every direct response fundraiser who can count eventually comes to the realization that reliance on premiums to boost short-term acquisition response rates is a long-term prescription for poor retention and lousy lifetime value. Many are unaware of the ample evidence in behavioral science for why premiums not only delude fundraisers but, far more importantly, […]

Learn More February 7, 2013

Stay The Course Or Step Change?

Yes, there are some ‘uncontrollables’ that will influence your fundraising success in 2014 — consumers’ confidence about their economic well-being, major breaking events/tragedies (political or natural), and of course the extent to which you laid proper groundwork (or failed to) in 2013. Still, in no small part, your nonprofit’s fundraising performance in 2014 will be […]

Learn More January 6, 2013

Acquisition: Direct Mail Testing – Part 2

One of the biggest pitfalls in direct mail testing is the ‘baby & the bathwater’ problem. The problem occurs when an organization or its consultant creates and mails a test package with numerous test elements. Or to put it in the vernacular, a whole bunch of stuff is changed. When this happens, the results for […]

Learn More December 5, 2012

<< 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 … 20 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!