• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Online Fundraising Mistakes

Fundraising Success just ran this article, 3 Common Online Fundraising Mistakes (and How to Avoid Them), featuring the views of Thomas Gensemer at Blue State Digital. As Gensemer sees it, the three mistakes are: Treat it like direct mail Focus too much on control Focus too much on asking for money I’m struck most by […]

Learn More October 13, 2010

Email And Donor Relationships

We all know email as the workhorse of online fundraising. But what about email as a relationship and loyalty building tool? Writing in Email Insider, Loren McDonald at Silverpop, an online marketing agency, offers some interesting examples of commercial email approaches that are not aimed directly at sales, although in some examples that objective clearly […]

Learn More October 8, 2010

Golden Givers

For your sake, I hope your nonprofit has lots of what American Express calls “Golden Givers.” As reported on Marketing Daily, “Golden Givers” are super-affluent women age 45 and under. How does Amex define “super-affluent”? You need to charge at least $7,000 per month on your card for at least 12 months! Is there any […]

Learn More September 3, 2010

Marketing Mania

I follow the articles of Kendall Allen, a marketing and digital media consultant who writes occasionally in Online Spin. In her latest article, she comments on some issues that drive commercial marketers nuts, and probably a lot of nonprofit marketers and fundraisers as well. She says: “…there are at least four areas that may drive […]

Learn More August 31, 2010

The Big Reveal

Sorry … I should not have teased you in yesterday’s post … The Donor You Don’t Know. [That said, the examples I gave were for real.] The tools I described that can give you a look at your donors’ actual giving to other organizations — and tell you how much you’re leaving on the table […]

Learn More August 19, 2010

The Donor You Don’t Know

You thought you “knew” her … the donor who’s given you $200 a year faithfully for the past five years. You’re happy to have her, because she’s loyal and responds to your first renewal notice, saving you money. Aren’t we content? Then you read she passed away and left $1 million to your competitor. But […]

Learn More August 18, 2010

Cut Attrition In Half

Want to know how CARE International cut in half the attrition rate of its face-to-face acquired donors? They’ve created an online reporting approach that speaks in a personalized way to individual donors, telling them in specific terms what their (i.e., “Your“) contributions are accomplishing. Wow! Doesn’t that sound like a no-brainer? Well, the concept might […]

Learn More July 27, 2010

Cashing In On The Chasm

In the case of many non-profits the much-vaunted “Fundraising Pyramid” too often resembles an hourglass.  Fat on the ends, skinny in the middle. So I was particularly pleased to see Nicole Wallace over at the Chronicle of Philanthropy recently tackle the subject of middle donor or mid-level donor programs. As the name implies, Mid-Level or […]

Learn More June 8, 2010

Report To Me

I was reading this article on effective email messaging, the gist of which was … make it relevant via personalization. Now there are a variety of ways to personalize, especially in (but not limited to) the online environment — using the donor’s location to tailor content, keying off of actions taken (completed a survey, signed […]

Learn More June 2, 2010

Facebook Privacy Woes

With so many nonprofits working Facebook into their marketing strategies, it behooves us all to keep an eye on their privacy controversy. Here’s an excellent report on the matter from Bloomberg. It notes that Facebook, now at 519 million users, shows no sign of slowing growth. Traffic was up nearly 5% in the week after […]

Learn More May 27, 2010

<< 1 … 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!