• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Tale Of Two Donations

Decades ago (I won’t admit exactly how far back that was!) I made my first donation. I was a grad student studying political theory at the time (arguably, an intellectual) and I received a direct mail appeal focused on how the seniority system in the US Congress was causing all sorts of bad policy … […]

Learn More January 15, 2015

Top Of Roger’s 2015 ‘To Do’ List

On Friday Tom announced that high on his recommended 2015 ‘To Do’ List for fundraisers is getting up to speed with online video storytelling. I’m putting the somewhat less glitzy but fundamentally essential task of continuing education, reading and learning on top of mine. Frankly, anyone with the goal of becoming an expert fundraiser or […]

Learn More January 11, 2015

Is It A Crisis? No, It’s A Year-end Appeal

As we were cleaning off our desks, emptying our ‘In’ and ‘Out’ baskets and generally tidying up Agitator Global Headquarters in preparation for 2015, we couldn’t help but notice the increasing frequency of inbound chimes in our mailbox. “Only 29 hours to go …” “ You have less than a day to get a 3 […]

Learn More January 6, 2015

Happy New Year!

Agitators in Australia and New Zealand, China, India and Thailand (most of the planet) are already into the New Year, while those in Europe, the U.K. and North and South America are still in their New Year’s Eve mode. No matter where you’re receiving this Agitator signal we wish you all the best in the […]

Learn More December 31, 2014

No Time To Innovate?

Roger is constantly harping about “Innovation” and “Change”. Will you innovate in 2015? No time? In this nugget from our 2012 archives, Roger demolishes the ‘no time to innovate’ excuse. Titled Wasting Time By Exalting The Trivial, it’s well worth another read … unless you plan to play 2015 as a year of trivial pursuit. […]

Learn More December 30, 2014

Enough With The Schadenfreude

To some, Charity:Water — both in terms of fundraising success and on-the-ground accomplishment — has been an inspiration; to others, a con job. To some, a success to envy; others to emulate; but to others a ‘success’ to privately hope crashes and burns. The same mixed reaction could be found with the Ice Bucket Challenge. […]

Learn More December 23, 2014

Training Video: Face-To-Face Fundraising

For many fundraisers, I suspect this is the last day of work as many sneak out for a long Christmas holiday. Although, for the hard core, the busiest time for face-to-face fundraising might well occur over the next five days. I’m talking really hard core fundraising … intercepting hapless citizens — who are wandering down […]

Learn More December 19, 2014

Mother Said …

Dorothy Craver died last night. She was 99 and ¾. She was my Mother. I will miss her lots. I owe her so much. Normally I don’t traffic in personal reminiscence in The Agitator, except to remind Tom of our shared past and our mutual obligations to the future of the nonprofit community. This is […]

Learn More December 16, 2014

Pavlovian Fundraising

Go ahead online fundraisers. Just treat your donors like commodities. Sheep to be herded. Baah! Baah! I can’t stand Pavlovian fundraising. My definition of Pavlovian fundraising is when the fundraiser uses any device other than the cause or mission itself to generate the gift. The worst offenders are you online fundraisers. Yes, we know devices […]

Learn More December 12, 2014

Secret To Work-Life Balance

All fundraisers are now caught up in the year-end fundraising frenzy. Only 31 days left to make your numbers for the year. Pressure. Pressure. And more pressure. Our U.S. fundraisers couldn’t even totally relax through their Thanksgiving holiday. Many were worrying … will three online appeals per week be enough or too much?! ‘Gluttony’ and […]

Learn More December 1, 2014

<< 1 … 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!